Of course the moon landing was faked. They wouldn't let that shit out so that US enemies (Russia during the cold war, etc) could get any useful information.
That said, while the videos were fake. I don't think the actual landing was. Consider that nowadays we have thousands of satellites orbiting the Earth in space, and they've been up there for quite a while, we definitely have the technology to do so. Add to that, that if any one country actually secures "the moon" and is able to hold it and develop military bases etc. they could have a huge military advantage. With satellites nowadays, every single square meter of the earth is viewable. You couldn't hide something like a nuclear program if you tried.
They definitely sent a manned craft of some sort to the moon, and it's not that much of a stretch to say that someone got out and walked around for a bit.
>Everything you just stated, you're taking on faith.
Actually I have a degree in Aerospace Engineering, so that basically makes me a rocket scientist \s
But here's a question for you. If satellites don't exist. How do you explain how GPS works? I mean, you COULD have them flying around in planes all day and night, but that'd be pretty expensive as opposed to having them in orbit.
As for why it's an issue now... it all comes down to funding. There is no military case for - nor money to be made from - landing on the moon any more. Back then, they had to do it because cold war and if the Russians somehow built a weapon on the moon, they needed to make sure they could deal with it. Nowadays, unless China decides to pull a "South China Sea" on The Moon, there just isn't a need to do it again.
Why does gps stop working in remote locations? Why have you never seen a satellite dish point anywhere other than the horizon? Doesn't matter where I go, coast to coast, the dishes are never pointed up.
Now, if you are telling me you're intelligent enough to have an advanced stem degree, but you also believe nasa put humans on the moon, I'm going to have a difficult time reconciling those things.
There's no need to go to the Moon? Didn't I read a paper that stated the Moon is covered in H3? If so, you could become very wealthy mining the Moon.
The Moon landings were faked, and the iss is complete bullshit.
Yeah, nah mate. Modern GPS systems do not use LORAN. It's much more expensive; no where near as accurate, especially over large distances; and you can prove it yourself: buy a GPS, and configure it to use LORAN. It won't work that way.
Doesn't matter where I go, coast to coast (US?), the dishes are never pointed up.
Of course not, they're all pointed some-what south towards the equator (in America), right? That's because of geosynchronous orbit. They need to point to a satellite (in space) that is located above the equator. If you go to countries on the equator, they'll point slightly east or west, but not north or south; and if you got to countries south of the equator (like Australia) they'll point north.
you could become very wealthy mining the Moon.
That's not how it works. It could be covered in diamond and unobtainium, but but unless you could could bring it back to Earth and sell it for more than it costs to get, you're not going to make any money. It costs around 50k USD / kg to send something into space. Estimate double that for a return journey at minimum, 100k / kg. And now you also need to send the equipment to actually do the "mining" as well, and some way to store the H3 that is robust enough to make it back to earth.
The moon landing was most likely real, the video they showed the world is probably faked, the ISS is real.
Diagram that. You'd have to point through the Earth, eh?
So, it's impossible that gps is just better LORAN? Why? You ever try to use gps deep in the ROcky Mouontains (Canadian ones, not those pussy hills America has)? It doesn't work, son.
Ever use a sat phone? How the fuck is that antenna doing anything to help talk to fucking space? Looks like a powered LTE antenna in the Garmin I dissected.
view the rest of the comments →
elitch2 ago
I'm agnostic. The Earth is certainly not the way nigger smokes grass tyson explains it.
nasa is 100% horseshit, and the Moon landing were faked.
I'd love for space to be real, I would.
So please, someone provide an practical experiment that proves the heliocentric model.
Because most of the observable evidence can be explained by the geocentric model.
matthew-- ago
Of course the moon landing was faked. They wouldn't let that shit out so that US enemies (Russia during the cold war, etc) could get any useful information.
That said, while the videos were fake. I don't think the actual landing was. Consider that nowadays we have thousands of satellites orbiting the Earth in space, and they've been up there for quite a while, we definitely have the technology to do so. Add to that, that if any one country actually secures "the moon" and is able to hold it and develop military bases etc. they could have a huge military advantage. With satellites nowadays, every single square meter of the earth is viewable. You couldn't hide something like a nuclear program if you tried.
They definitely sent a manned craft of some sort to the moon, and it's not that much of a stretch to say that someone got out and walked around for a bit.
elitch2 ago
Everything you just stated, you're taking on faith.
You've never seen a satellite.
Also, if they went to the moon in the 60's, why is it an issue now? https://invidio.us/search?q=nasa+can%27t+go+to+mmon
matthew-- ago
>Everything you just stated, you're taking on faith.
Actually I have a degree in Aerospace Engineering, so that basically makes me a rocket scientist \s
But here's a question for you. If satellites don't exist. How do you explain how GPS works? I mean, you COULD have them flying around in planes all day and night, but that'd be pretty expensive as opposed to having them in orbit.
As for why it's an issue now... it all comes down to funding. There is no military case for - nor money to be made from - landing on the moon any more. Back then, they had to do it because cold war and if the Russians somehow built a weapon on the moon, they needed to make sure they could deal with it. Nowadays, unless China decides to pull a "South China Sea" on The Moon, there just isn't a need to do it again.
elitch2 ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LORAN We've had this tech since the 40's.
Why does gps stop working in remote locations? Why have you never seen a satellite dish point anywhere other than the horizon? Doesn't matter where I go, coast to coast, the dishes are never pointed up.
Now, if you are telling me you're intelligent enough to have an advanced stem degree, but you also believe nasa put humans on the moon, I'm going to have a difficult time reconciling those things.
There's no need to go to the Moon? Didn't I read a paper that stated the Moon is covered in H3? If so, you could become very wealthy mining the Moon.
The Moon landings were faked, and the iss is complete bullshit.
matthew-- ago
Yeah, nah mate. Modern GPS systems do not use LORAN. It's much more expensive; no where near as accurate, especially over large distances; and you can prove it yourself: buy a GPS, and configure it to use LORAN. It won't work that way.
Of course not, they're all pointed some-what south towards the equator (in America), right? That's because of geosynchronous orbit. They need to point to a satellite (in space) that is located above the equator. If you go to countries on the equator, they'll point slightly east or west, but not north or south; and if you got to countries south of the equator (like Australia) they'll point north.
That's not how it works. It could be covered in diamond and unobtainium, but but unless you could could bring it back to Earth and sell it for more than it costs to get, you're not going to make any money. It costs around 50k USD / kg to send something into space. Estimate double that for a return journey at minimum, 100k / kg. And now you also need to send the equipment to actually do the "mining" as well, and some way to store the H3 that is robust enough to make it back to earth.
The moon landing was most likely real, the video they showed the world is probably faked, the ISS is real.
elitch2 ago
You think geostationary means it's over the equator? https://in-the-sky.org/satmap_worldmap.php# this says differently.
Diagram that. You'd have to point through the Earth, eh?
So, it's impossible that gps is just better LORAN? Why? You ever try to use gps deep in the ROcky Mouontains (Canadian ones, not those pussy hills America has)? It doesn't work, son.
Ever use a sat phone? How the fuck is that antenna doing anything to help talk to fucking space? Looks like a powered LTE antenna in the Garmin I dissected.
If the ISS is real, why do they fake everything they broadcast? Here https://hooktube.com/results?search_query=iss+green+screen+harness or in swimming pools https://hooktube.com/results?search_query=iss+swimming+pool