It's a funny feeling, when you understand all by yourself that something is not right, based on your own intuition, rather than on information that was already analysed and exposed by somebody else.
It's obvious that the elite are afraid of conspiracy sites, therefore it was no surprise that popular search engines owned by the elite are busy with hiding independent sources of informations that are being censored by mainstream mass media in first place.
What was not obvious yet for me, is that the elite are not only afraid of straight talking conspirologists, but they are afraid of any kind of intelligent people in general.
I have discovered that the elite are censoring even entertainment sites, and even shutting them down, because creative people are able at thinking too.
First IMDb have shut down their forums, which was explained as a mere logistic choice based on the fact that they were too much expensive to keep on line. Next, Metacritic not only closed their forums too, but also closed the section about books reviews. Also Rotten Tomatoes closed their forums too.
Since I was feeling too much paranoid about seemingly harmless entertainment forums, I have contacted Mark Doyle, the founder of Metacritic, since he is the most likable of the three web site creators, and just asked him straight to the point about why these changes suddenly took place on his site.
Mark Doyle told me that Metacritic is no longer his property, that it was acquired by somebody else. Also he added that shutting down the forums had no big impact on the financial part of running an already huge web site. Also he added that he has no idea why the new owners quit publishing reviews about books, since there is always obvious demand in book reviews.
The only rational explanation is that all the three most popular sites were acquired by the elite, who decided to eliminate platforms of discussions for the thinking people. Anyway, the most obviously absurd clue is that Metacritic has no more book reviews, which is completely irrational and goes against the site's purpose. People who read are the most dangerous.
view the rest of the comments →
emperorbma ago
Company acquisition is the path from capitalism to corporatism. It's an important distinction to make, too.
Capitalism is the economy of the workers trading the fruits of their labors to acquire for their needs. The "farmers' market" or the "mom and pop" selling stuff to their community.
Corporatism is the ramrod of an ever growing "big business" maximizing their profit at the expense of everyone else so that shareholders can get a bigger cut.
This is the logical difference that socialists don't understand. Socialists conflate the latter with the former. But that's as dumb as suggesting that all lung tissue is cancer because you can get lung cancer.
Ultimately, the difference between corporatism and socialism is little to none. Both are giving more power to middle managers with no regard for anyone but themselves. The socialist (fake) "workers' revolution" gives power to a political Politburo. The capitalist amalgamation becomes cancerous when it turns into corporate crap.
Small businesses are real capitalism. Small businesses are the real "worker's revolution" because it takes power out of the hands of the managers and puts it into the hands of the people. We need real capitalism, not socialism or corporatism. People working for themselves and their community, not for an anonymous "investor" somewhere that serves "powers unknown."
LexOrandiLexCredendi ago
Even the word "corporatism" is a misused term. Formerly it referred to a legit system of protecting the labor rights of craftsmen through the guild system (which wasn't perfect, but better than nothing).
A better word is "plutocracy", but even my spell checker doesn't recognize that one.
AnthraxAlex ago
I always figured it was just corporate communism when a corporate monopoly or monopoly of corporate interests seize the means of production and start social engineering large parts of society.They are essentially just acting as the party and subvert any capitalist principles in order to maintain control. Look at google, every other day there are some new internal materials released where they talk about their desire to engineer every social system and that they are moving away from principles of free speech, private ownership etc etc. they just incorporated Marxism and because they were previously a capitalist entity at one point years and years ago in the past can use it as a cover.
LexOrandiLexCredendi ago
Actually they are following down the road of the Foundations in bringing capitalism and Marxism into a unified system.
Check out Norman Dodd's interview on YouTube about his research for the Reece Committee. The Globalist plan has been going for over 100 years now and both corporations and NGOs are at the heart of it.