It's a funny feeling, when you understand all by yourself that something is not right, based on your own intuition, rather than on information that was already analysed and exposed by somebody else.
It's obvious that the elite are afraid of conspiracy sites, therefore it was no surprise that popular search engines owned by the elite are busy with hiding independent sources of informations that are being censored by mainstream mass media in first place.
What was not obvious yet for me, is that the elite are not only afraid of straight talking conspirologists, but they are afraid of any kind of intelligent people in general.
I have discovered that the elite are censoring even entertainment sites, and even shutting them down, because creative people are able at thinking too.
First IMDb have shut down their forums, which was explained as a mere logistic choice based on the fact that they were too much expensive to keep on line. Next, Metacritic not only closed their forums too, but also closed the section about books reviews. Also Rotten Tomatoes closed their forums too.
Since I was feeling too much paranoid about seemingly harmless entertainment forums, I have contacted Mark Doyle, the founder of Metacritic, since he is the most likable of the three web site creators, and just asked him straight to the point about why these changes suddenly took place on his site.
Mark Doyle told me that Metacritic is no longer his property, that it was acquired by somebody else. Also he added that shutting down the forums had no big impact on the financial part of running an already huge web site. Also he added that he has no idea why the new owners quit publishing reviews about books, since there is always obvious demand in book reviews.
The only rational explanation is that all the three most popular sites were acquired by the elite, who decided to eliminate platforms of discussions for the thinking people. Anyway, the most obviously absurd clue is that Metacritic has no more book reviews, which is completely irrational and goes against the site's purpose. People who read are the most dangerous.
view the rest of the comments →
Caveman_in_a_suit ago
It's always been like this, since before the Internet when elites owned almost all newspapers, wire services, tv stations, book publishing, magazines, and radio. It's only relatively recently that the herd broke out of containment where they could discuss, develop, and research ideas without governing controls. It's just taken the elite about 20 years to catch up enough to reinstitute the same historic controls in this new medium of communication.
TheTrigger ago
All of history has been a version of this game of cat-and-mouse. Even since before the Catholic church started hoarding knowledge. I honestly think that, aside from price-gouging: this is part of the reason why printer ink is still so artificially expensive. Sometimes, prohibitively so. For no other reason than to discourage people from mass-producing their own self-published books and easily disseminating them— without having to pay their pound of flesh to the jewish media cartel.
cthulian_axioms ago
In fairness, inkjet liquid is no small feat of engineering. The higher quality the image you want, the smaller the ink droplets (or toner particles) have to be. Getting liquids to spray out in micrometer-sized droplets of consistent size, without clogging the nozzle head, is surprisingly difficult.
Laser toner, on the other hand, is basically nano-dust.
TheTrigger ago
I won't pretend to know everything about the various different manufacturing processes of printer cartridges. However, even goddamned Teslas got cheaper, over time. I do know a lot about assembly lines and modern production floors, for a few different types of factories, due to the type of work I used to be in. And one thing I know for certain is that, overtime, things always get more streamlined and less expensive.
It's inevitable. Even if it's a hack-job, you're taking on a new client, and things are running relatively inefficiently: you will, eventually, figure out a way to bottom-out your cost-per-unit, to the bare minimum. I refuse to believe that the manufacturing process for said ink/toner hasn't vastly improved, since the '90s, to the point where it make the lack of a price-drop conspicuous, to say the least. Especially considering its demand.
Then there's all those gray-area shops which used to pop up, all the time (and are harder to come by, these days, for some reason), that would sell off-brand ink/toner. And it would be just-as effective, if not moreso, than the brand-name one. Places who could refill your cartridge for $5, instead of paying $50 for a new one.
Printer manufacturers went to war with these people, the same way Apple is going after phone-repair shops, now. I see the trend, and something tells me that the high-price for ink, to this day, is absolutely 100% artificial.