PSA: Naming the Jew about to become Illegal and it just passed Congress. (Conspiracy)

submitted ago by fhaqyu

H.R.1911 - Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Act of 2018

Link to the justification for Goats who actually read past the titles here.

How many of the incidents that are used as examples do you think the perp turned out to be jewish themselves???

Summary for you lazy faggots | Shown Here

Introduced in House (04/05/2017) Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Act of 2017

This bill amends the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to provide that the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism shall have the rank of ambassador and be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

The Special Envoy shall: (1) be a person of recognized distinction in the field of combating anti-Semitism or religious freedom; (2) serve as the primary advisor to, and coordinate efforts across, the U.S. government relating to monitoring and combating anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement in foreign countries; and (3) report directly to the Secretary of State.

Goats, this bill already passed the congressional vote with overwhelming support and is going to the Senate then TRUMP, then law. While you all have your panties in a bunch from the wave of the Q believers, let's not let them sneak this past us.

If this law passes, nearly every American goat on this site, is going to be prosecuted under federal law from even half the shit we say. Naming the Jew will be illegal. This is the very definition of what the right to free speech brings, the right to name the jew, the black, the white, the whatever the fuck you want to name. It clearly states, Trump will name the individual who will serve as the Judge/Jury/Executioner. He has sent more money than any American President to Israel to continue their reign of terror. He will take away our right to free speech, now is not the time to wait.

This is your right as a human but in law, it's the right of EVERY AMERICAN to say what the fuck you want to say and to whom. They will make it illegal for SPEAKING. think about this, fuck all this media bullshit, this is the real fucking news.

Stop being distracted by riddles, stop being angry at the immigrants and for fucks sake, let's all band together to protect the first thing that makes America truly great.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

senpaithatignoresyou ago

Would this survive the supreme court?

thisistotallynotme ago

Yes, it'll survive the supreme court, you illiterate fuck, because [upgrading a position to ambassadorship](https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr1911/text, which is what this bill does, has ZERO bearing on free speech.

You idiots all swallowed the bait.

draaaak ago

Nope.

Norseman ago

yes, because in the name of "fighting terrorism" this is aimed at foreigners in other countries, not Americans,so the supreme court will have shit none to say about it.

Feldorai ago

No, it would not survive the supreme court. They know as well as every Constitution-loving American knows that the moment they step out of bounds to not enforce the Constitutional rights of every American, the moment they try to impede on the right to free speech, then the immediate response will likely be to see them hanged for treason in committing tyranny. They sure as Hell won't be safe, there would be sudden and immediate empty seats among the supreme court branches following their deaths.

thisistotallynotme ago

Why would an appointment of ambassadorship even make it to the supreme court, let alone survive its test?

You didn't even read the bill, but you didn't let that stop you from having an opinion, did you?

Feldorai ago

2.Finding Congress finds that since the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004 was enacted, in many foreign countries acts of anti-Semitism have been frequent and wide in scope, the perpetrators and variety of threats to Jewish communities and their institutions have proliferated, and in some countries anti-Semitic attacks have increased in frequency, scope, violence, and deadliness.

Where is their proof, their evidence for citation? Muslims? Mosques? Oh yes, the Goyim know well about these, they'll pass such a legislation no problem!

As far as I've seen Muslims have only ever fucking attacked white people and have been covered up for by the Media, they have no evidence for citation to enact such a bill or even to support it. Let's put it this way, it will not survive the Supreme Court because the Constitution is against it. They have no proof or evidence for citation that Jews have faced any such acts of violence in America, the bill is unnecessary and pointless. It'll be slapped down regardless. America is not Germany or any other country in Europe where they don't have a bill of Constitutional rights to guarantee them the freedom of speech. America on the other hand, does. Americans don't have to worry about this, you're distracted by something this trivial? Get a grip.

It will not survive the supreme court, that I can guarantee. What you should be more focused on is keeping tabs on all of the Congress & Senate representatives that sign in support of the legislation and vote them the fuck out.

thisistotallynotme ago

Good lord, child. Most people would stop and think about what they were doing when they were shown that the bill didn't do what it said it did.

You, however, doubled the fuck down on it. Is this your first time reading a bill? The preamble and justification is great when judges need to interpret a law, but here's the thing:

TELL ME WHY AN AMBASSADORSHIP UPGRADE FOR AN EXSITING POSITION WOULD STOP YOU FROM NAMING THE JEW.

Feldorai ago

Also, the question shouldn't be about whether it would survive the supreme court, or how it gets twisted into meaning that someone would be arrested for wrong-think for naming the Jew or that it's infringing on the Constitution.

In the first place the question should be, "why should anyone be granted the title of ambassador for something as stupid as anti-Semitism?"

Sounds like that Team America World Police bullshit all over again if you ask me.

thisistotallynotme ago

I'll agree with that, but remember this ambassadorship has no prosecutorial powers. or even investigatory powers.

Feldorai ago

But if I'm not mistaken, they're given Diplomatic Immunity if I remember correctly. This more or less sounds to me like the operations targets will all always be in countries other than America's, the way it's worded I can't imagine it being granted for any matters concerning affairs in America. At least it doesn't sound that way unless I'm missing something in the way it's worded in the bill.

thisistotallynotme ago

You're not missing anything. All diplomatic immunity means is that they won't be prosecuted if they gun-down a schoolyard of kids in a foreign country.

(as an aside, it costs $200,000 to become a Panamanian diplomat).

Feldorai ago

Well both questions I don't know. I was just answering how I think it's stupid to think that it means what OP was suggesting, and responded to how the other person asking a question in the thread if it would survive the supreme court, which that response was a "no".

Rawrination ago

They should have been hanged for treason long ago.

Hopefully the number of people willing to take a stand will be high enough this time.

I wish I could be among them. I will keep trying to redpill my normie friends but I fear its all I can do as disabled as I am.

Tallest_Skil ago

Interestingly, the SCOTUS voted 9-0 recently that “hate speech” does not exist, by law. However, this is about jews, so they’ll likely vote 9-0 that it does.

OhRutherfordBehave ago

link?

Tallest_Skil ago

They go 9-0 on “hate speech” every time it comes up, surprisingly, but this is the most recent one.