You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Fateswebb ago

There were no planes

Oh_Well_ian ago

half right...

no planes at Pentagon or Shanksville

Fateswebb ago

Actually if you pay attention the same applies for the WTC.... It was just faked better

Oh_Well_ian ago

lol sure buddy...

that is absurd and all you CGI fags are either stupid or disinformation agents

Fateswebb ago

Okay ill ignore the baseless ad hominem attack and treat you like a reasonable person so then do explain why...

1) there is video without a plane

2) when the plane hits all damage is to the building and the plane itself doesn't crumple, doesn't break apart, or anything it just disappears.

Discounting something because it seems far fetched is what they want you to do.. I thought this was silly at first too, but then I took an honest look and sure enough.... It's real..

Video of no plane just explosion https://youtu.be/fGgl3zSN4eM

No damage to plane at all

https://youtu.be/cJNcRMn83vE

And again

https://youtu.be/2DqcxksSvII

So do explain how a plane that should have been crumpling and wings should have fallen off and tail should have fallen off just disappeared completely with absolutely no damage at all. When plans land a little hard the tail falls right off.. for instance

https://youtu.be/ExwU6FScZ94

Buy we're to believe not only did that not happen the plane entered the building completely unharmed only the building was hurt? Come on back up your claim that I'm a "fag" and a disinformation agent now...

Oh_Well_ian ago

Video of no plane just explosion https://youtu.be/fGgl3zSN4eMYouTube

wow... an ENTIRE 2 SECOND VIDEO of the far side of the South Tower that you're pitching as the impact side with one of the weakest, most ridiculous hack edits ever

come on, dude... this is silly lol

Fateswebb ago

That's one video there are more like it from other angles. So far you have proven nothing. Pretty telling for how you came out of the gate on attack claiming disinformation. Wouldn't disinformation be easy to debunk. But you have been unable to debunk 2 seconds of evidence with no explanation at all, and still offer no explanation as to the most compelling evidence provided NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE, NO CRUMPLING, so was that edited by disinformation artists too? Because that can be shown in every single official story video there is.. why was the plane completely undamaged and just simply disappearing into a slit? Can't explain it can you?

Oh_Well_ian ago

btw... I'm an expert on 9/11 and I really can't understand why you're wasting your time with someone who is laughing in your face.

The B-thing >> https://www.gelitin.net/projects/b-thing/ Hmmm... climbing gear and 'geli(a)tin'... what could that be for?

Fateswebb ago

Also the drawing is VERY INNACURATE.