Okay ill ignore the baseless ad hominem attack and treat you like a reasonable person so then do explain why...
1) there is video without a plane
2) when the plane hits all damage is to the building and the plane itself doesn't crumple, doesn't break apart, or anything it just disappears.
Discounting something because it seems far fetched is what they want you to do.. I thought this was silly at first too, but then I took an honest look and sure enough.... It's real..
So do explain how a plane that should have been crumpling and wings should have fallen off and tail should have fallen off just disappeared completely with absolutely no damage at all. When plans land a little hard the tail falls right off.. for instance
Buy we're to believe not only did that not happen the plane entered the building completely unharmed only the building was hurt? Come on back up your claim that I'm a "fag" and a disinformation agent now...
wow... an ENTIRE 2 SECOND VIDEO of the far side of the South Tower that you're pitching as the impact side with one of the weakest, most ridiculous hack edits ever
That's one video there are more like it from other angles. So far you have proven nothing. Pretty telling for how you came out of the gate on attack claiming disinformation. Wouldn't disinformation be easy to debunk. But you have been unable to debunk 2 seconds of evidence with no explanation at all, and still offer no explanation as to the most compelling evidence provided NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE, NO CRUMPLING, so was that edited by disinformation artists too? Because that can be shown in every single official story video there is.. why was the plane completely undamaged and just simply disappearing into a slit? Can't explain it can you?
Also I can answer this.. they made cgi of people jumping to their deaths. If you're truly interested I can provide proof for that as well...... There is plenty
Uh dude that's old news... I know all about it.. pfft.. the filming crew that took over a floor and used a helicopter to get footage of people in the windows so they could USE IT later in CGI video showing people in the windows and jumping to their deaths. What you're discussing now actually directly supports the theory I presented.. that there were no planes.
And zacheim is who the antizionists give credit for being Mastermind of 9/11
its clear you focus only on the antizionist angle, which I am not saying doesn't have merit, but you fail to see anything that you cannot pin on a jew. I checked your submission and comment history, it is all about the jews.. sure they may have and probably did have something to do with 9/11 it sure looks that way, but you have a one track mind and cant see anything else dude. its called one sighted confirmation bias.
You did nothing dude. Still ignore that there was no damage to the plane? No comment on that whatso ever? I'm gonna go ahead and call you a disinformation artist now. You have been exposed. You have offered no explanation at all for anything at all with the exception that possibly the one building was in the foreground. You didn't offer proof of that but a plausible explanation for the weakest point made. Other than that you're ignoring the most obvious evidence. I win this round because of your obvious giving up, or refusal to open your eyes. Again NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE AT ALL. NO CRUMPLING, NO WING DAMAGE, NO TAIL DAMAGE, PLANE DISAPPEARING INTO A SLIT... I provided a video of a plane simply landing a bit rough and the tail falling off. You ignore all that and claim you have accomplished something simply by making the claim "someone could have edited the other video. But this point is in every single video released. NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE. HOW??????? oh yeah and a little of your own medicine for a cherry on top.... "Fag"
view the rest of the comments →
Fateswebb ago
There were no planes
Oh_Well_ian ago
half right...
no planes at Pentagon or Shanksville
Fateswebb ago
Actually if you pay attention the same applies for the WTC.... It was just faked better
Oh_Well_ian ago
lol sure buddy...
that is absurd and all you CGI fags are either stupid or disinformation agents
Fateswebb ago
Okay ill ignore the baseless ad hominem attack and treat you like a reasonable person so then do explain why...
1) there is video without a plane
2) when the plane hits all damage is to the building and the plane itself doesn't crumple, doesn't break apart, or anything it just disappears.
Discounting something because it seems far fetched is what they want you to do.. I thought this was silly at first too, but then I took an honest look and sure enough.... It's real..
Video of no plane just explosion https://youtu.be/fGgl3zSN4eM
No damage to plane at all
https://youtu.be/cJNcRMn83vE
And again
https://youtu.be/2DqcxksSvII
So do explain how a plane that should have been crumpling and wings should have fallen off and tail should have fallen off just disappeared completely with absolutely no damage at all. When plans land a little hard the tail falls right off.. for instance
https://youtu.be/ExwU6FScZ94
Buy we're to believe not only did that not happen the plane entered the building completely unharmed only the building was hurt? Come on back up your claim that I'm a "fag" and a disinformation agent now...
Oh_Well_ian ago
wow... an ENTIRE 2 SECOND VIDEO of the far side of the South Tower that you're pitching as the impact side with one of the weakest, most ridiculous hack edits ever
come on, dude... this is silly lol
Fateswebb ago
That's one video there are more like it from other angles. So far you have proven nothing. Pretty telling for how you came out of the gate on attack claiming disinformation. Wouldn't disinformation be easy to debunk. But you have been unable to debunk 2 seconds of evidence with no explanation at all, and still offer no explanation as to the most compelling evidence provided NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE, NO CRUMPLING, so was that edited by disinformation artists too? Because that can be shown in every single official story video there is.. why was the plane completely undamaged and just simply disappearing into a slit? Can't explain it can you?
Oh_Well_ian ago
btw... I'm an expert on 9/11 and I really can't understand why you're wasting your time with someone who is laughing in your face.
The B-thing >> https://www.gelitin.net/projects/b-thing/ Hmmm... climbing gear and 'geli(a)tin'... what could that be for?
Fateswebb ago
Also I can answer this.. they made cgi of people jumping to their deaths. If you're truly interested I can provide proof for that as well...... There is plenty
Fateswebb ago
Also the drawing is VERY INNACURATE.
Fateswebb ago
Oh and by the way I have the actual blueprints in original format for the buildings. This site has a child's scribbling. Just saying.
Oh_Well_ian ago
You have no idea what the B-THING and E-TEAM are and you pretend to be an expert on 9/11? hahahaha
Tell me who Dov Zackheim is... ( I'll wait )
Fateswebb ago
Uh dude that's old news... I know all about it.. pfft.. the filming crew that took over a floor and used a helicopter to get footage of people in the windows so they could USE IT later in CGI video showing people in the windows and jumping to their deaths. What you're discussing now actually directly supports the theory I presented.. that there were no planes.
And zacheim is who the antizionists give credit for being Mastermind of 9/11
Oh_Well_ian ago
CEEEEE GEEEEE EYEEEEEE !!!
fucking hilarious >blocked< buh bye dopey
Fateswebb ago
its clear you focus only on the antizionist angle, which I am not saying doesn't have merit, but you fail to see anything that you cannot pin on a jew. I checked your submission and comment history, it is all about the jews.. sure they may have and probably did have something to do with 9/11 it sure looks that way, but you have a one track mind and cant see anything else dude. its called one sighted confirmation bias.
Fateswebb ago
Pretty sure I got you beat on the 9/11 expert thing kiddo... You're too closed minded. Take you on any day on that topic.
Oh_Well_ian ago
CEEEEEEE GEEEEEE EYEEEEEEEE !!!
buzz off, you disinfo cunt
Oh_Well_ian ago
where are the other videos? lol I just obliterated your entire pathetic proof.
you're sad, buddy.
Fateswebb ago
NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE AT ALL. NO CRUMPLING, NO WING DAMAGE, NO TAIL DAMAGE, PLANE DISAPPEARING INTO A SLIT..
NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE AT ALL. NO CRUMPLING, NO WING DAMAGE, NO TAIL DAMAGE, PLANE DISAPPEARING INTO A SLIT..
NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE AT ALL. NO CRUMPLING, NO WING DAMAGE, NO TAIL DAMAGE, PLANE DISAPPEARING INTO A SLIT..
Fateswebb ago
You did nothing dude. Still ignore that there was no damage to the plane? No comment on that whatso ever? I'm gonna go ahead and call you a disinformation artist now. You have been exposed. You have offered no explanation at all for anything at all with the exception that possibly the one building was in the foreground. You didn't offer proof of that but a plausible explanation for the weakest point made. Other than that you're ignoring the most obvious evidence. I win this round because of your obvious giving up, or refusal to open your eyes. Again NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE AT ALL. NO CRUMPLING, NO WING DAMAGE, NO TAIL DAMAGE, PLANE DISAPPEARING INTO A SLIT... I provided a video of a plane simply landing a bit rough and the tail falling off. You ignore all that and claim you have accomplished something simply by making the claim "someone could have edited the other video. But this point is in every single video released. NO DAMAGE TO THE PLANE. HOW??????? oh yeah and a little of your own medicine for a cherry on top.... "Fag"