You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Lordbananafist ago

so when will this actually mean something?

my personal deadline is 16 months after Q started posting or March of 2019.

CowWithBeef ago

Q never even mentioned the sealed indictments afaik. They're a great mystery and anomaly. Autist research makes this table. I wonder why shills show up when we talk about this. Do their owners know who will be indicted?

Tallest_Skil ago

Q never even mentioned the sealed indictments afaik.

Check the first three weeks of its posts.

They’re a great mystery and anomaly.

They’re not, really. 180 days from the ratification of the indictment, a court case pertaining to the contents thereof must be held. The indictment DOES NOT HAVE TO BE UNSEALED unless the person therein named personally testifies in court, BUT the court date deadline is set in stone (except for an extension, which can be granted, but which requires documentation of the extension... which we don’t have). Those first indictments? They’re coming due in a few weeks. Nothing is happening.

CowWithBeef ago

I was hoping to get a comment like this one when I posted. I see this chart updated every month and don't really understand it. I'm probably not alone.

Tallest_Skil ago

Q-LARP thrives on not telling anyone anything. There’s no rule of law in America anymore, but there’s evidence in a paper trail. Even the lack of a trail is evidence. Sealed indictments are a time bomb. Sometimes they explode, sometimes they’re just a dud. But their existence always leads to one of those two options; there aren’t any others. It’s very black and white, and any claims made about their purpose can be proven or disproven based on the outcome.