You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Lordbananafist ago

so when will this actually mean something?

my personal deadline is 16 months after Q started posting or March of 2019.

Tallest_Skil ago

Your deadline should have been a week after he started posting when his “predictions” were proven to all be lies.

drj2 ago

Any logic to that or just feelings?

RickFlairWOOOOOO ago

He's gay. He's got a lot of mixed up feelings.

Tallest_Skil ago

any logic to that

Did you seriously just fucking ask if there was logic to the act of NOT BELIEVING SOMEONE WHO IS PROVEN TO BE LYING? Holy fuck.

drj2 ago

Logic is tied to facts, not opinions. So I’ll ask how you prove someone is lying with no facts? I assume there are no facts since you haven’t produced any, only feelings.

Tallest_Skil ago

So I’ll ask how you prove someone is lying with no facts?

If... he has no facts, he is inherently lying. How is that a question?

I assume there are no facts since you haven’t produced any

What the fuck are you even talking about? Everything Q-LARP has said has been proven to be a lie.

RickFlairWOOOOOO ago

I'm a heterosexual male. You cannot see my penis faggot!

Tallest_Skil ago

Reported for spam.

RickFlairWOOOOOO ago

Just get food from the food bank faggot. Report all you want they wont give you anything to eat.

drj2 ago

"big foot doesn't exist, it's a proven fact."

And I'm asking how do you prove it?

RickFlairWOOOOOO ago

He just want's to see your penis.

Tallest_Skil ago

”big foot doesn't exist, it's a proven fact."

  1. Strawman.
  2. Nice try; you can’t prove a negative.
  3. We have proven a positive. Q-LARP made claims. Claims didn’t come true. Q-LARP is a liar and a hoaxer.

RickFlairWOOOOOO ago

Shove your own dick up your own ass. Faggot.

Tallest_Skil ago

Reported for spam. Thanks for admitting that Q-LARP is a hoax.

RickFlairWOOOOOO ago

Your a heroin addict off the streets of Tel-Aviv fuckin nonsense is this tricking on voat for spam.

Lordbananafist ago

yea I'm giving an unreasonable amount of time for argumentative purposes.

CowWithBeef ago

Q never even mentioned the sealed indictments afaik. They're a great mystery and anomaly. Autist research makes this table. I wonder why shills show up when we talk about this. Do their owners know who will be indicted?

Lordbananafist ago

Q began posting in November of 2017. Q groupies consistently use the sealed indictments as an indicator of progress against "the swamp".

you yourself just called them a "mystery and anomaly". That kind of language isn't used with quantitative indicators of progress. I'm wondering when we will see actual progress.

I'd love to see the names. Sooner rather than later I hope.

Tallest_Skil ago

Q never even mentioned the sealed indictments afaik.

Check the first three weeks of its posts.

They’re a great mystery and anomaly.

They’re not, really. 180 days from the ratification of the indictment, a court case pertaining to the contents thereof must be held. The indictment DOES NOT HAVE TO BE UNSEALED unless the person therein named personally testifies in court, BUT the court date deadline is set in stone (except for an extension, which can be granted, but which requires documentation of the extension... which we don’t have). Those first indictments? They’re coming due in a few weeks. Nothing is happening.

CowWithBeef ago

I was hoping to get a comment like this one when I posted. I see this chart updated every month and don't really understand it. I'm probably not alone.

Tallest_Skil ago

Q-LARP thrives on not telling anyone anything. There’s no rule of law in America anymore, but there’s evidence in a paper trail. Even the lack of a trail is evidence. Sealed indictments are a time bomb. Sometimes they explode, sometimes they’re just a dud. But their existence always leads to one of those two options; there aren’t any others. It’s very black and white, and any claims made about their purpose can be proven or disproven based on the outcome.