Nope I selected to look at new post and I'm well versed on the nature of our flat earth. I cannot view the vid at work and Im eagar to get ahead of what ever errors are at play because the earth is flat its an observable and scientific fact.
The summary is, that if the earth were flat the parts that are lit during the day would be different than if it were spherical. This is shown that based on what's lit during the day in order for the earth to be flat the points of origin of the light that lights the lit parts of the earth would have to be many many directional lights in different positions, in order to cover the area that is lit. Not only that these directional lights would have to be constantly moving and Turning on and off. However if you make the earth spherical, then it all points to a single light source and all from a single position. The sun. But really dude all you have to do is realize that the sun rises from the landscape and sets into it. And that the paths we fly in a plane also prove the earth isn't flat. If we were to take these paths in planes on a flat Earth model the plane would be constantly banking and therefore constantly tilted to the side. Also for whatever reason every single pilot would be taking not the straight and quickest path to our destination but for some reason going in a out of the way curve to get there. Not to mention many flights would run out of gas. Why not use actual logic to decide things?
I think you've not been introduced to the concept of the vanishing point and the effects of light through the atmos etc or a very close and much smaller sun before. This argument seems to be oblivious to that unless they attempt to counter those points at all I'm not aware.
Dude, okay cool name... But anyways.. uh first of all you're trying to bend reality to make something fit that just doesn't when there's a very easy logical explanation that everyone else accepts and you don't. But really at this point you could either watch the source material or just not make comments...
at 1:06 an insufficiently substantiated argument is made and due to the sloppy evidence provided an incorrect conclusion is made.
The sun as it travels over the course of the year moves closer and closer to the north pole and then closer and closer the the magnetic south pole of the ring magnet field. It will be found at different points continually. The only way to accurately determine the convergence of the vectors or divergence is to actually take instrument readings from the different points at the exact same time. This would have to be an intentional measurement for the purpose of determining the distance of the sun from earth. However the loose correlation without such controls demonstrated to be in place gives me an even stronger hypothesis to test as more exact control will provide more exact results and given what we see is what we would expect if we tested with the inverse of control intentionally if the results were that the earth is flat and the sun is close upon intentional exact control.
But dude wake up and look outside. If the Earth was flat the sun would not rise, it would come around... Why the fuck does it come out of the horizon? Why does it sink into the horizon at night? Sunset and sunrise prove the Earth isn't flat..
Example of vanishing point using the setting sun. They zoom in with a bad ass camera that anyone can buy that has super high zoom capability and the sun rises back up again, then when they zoom back out it sets again.... Vanishing point. you probably learned about it in art class.
view the rest of the comments →
RickFlairWOOOOOO ago
bold claims... The earth has been flat for a long long time. Can you summarize the findings?
qwop ago
Are you a bot? You responded almost instantly with a cookie cutter comment. It's a 4 minute video. That's the summary.
RickFlairWOOOOOO ago
Nope I selected to look at new post and I'm well versed on the nature of our flat earth. I cannot view the vid at work and Im eagar to get ahead of what ever errors are at play because the earth is flat its an observable and scientific fact.
Fateswebb ago
The summary is, that if the earth were flat the parts that are lit during the day would be different than if it were spherical. This is shown that based on what's lit during the day in order for the earth to be flat the points of origin of the light that lights the lit parts of the earth would have to be many many directional lights in different positions, in order to cover the area that is lit. Not only that these directional lights would have to be constantly moving and Turning on and off. However if you make the earth spherical, then it all points to a single light source and all from a single position. The sun. But really dude all you have to do is realize that the sun rises from the landscape and sets into it. And that the paths we fly in a plane also prove the earth isn't flat. If we were to take these paths in planes on a flat Earth model the plane would be constantly banking and therefore constantly tilted to the side. Also for whatever reason every single pilot would be taking not the straight and quickest path to our destination but for some reason going in a out of the way curve to get there. Not to mention many flights would run out of gas. Why not use actual logic to decide things?
RickFlairWOOOOOO ago
I think you've not been introduced to the concept of the vanishing point and the effects of light through the atmos etc or a very close and much smaller sun before. This argument seems to be oblivious to that unless they attempt to counter those points at all I'm not aware.
Fateswebb ago
Dude, okay cool name... But anyways.. uh first of all you're trying to bend reality to make something fit that just doesn't when there's a very easy logical explanation that everyone else accepts and you don't. But really at this point you could either watch the source material or just not make comments...
RickFlairWOOOOOO ago
at 1:06 an insufficiently substantiated argument is made and due to the sloppy evidence provided an incorrect conclusion is made.
The sun as it travels over the course of the year moves closer and closer to the north pole and then closer and closer the the magnetic south pole of the ring magnet field. It will be found at different points continually. The only way to accurately determine the convergence of the vectors or divergence is to actually take instrument readings from the different points at the exact same time. This would have to be an intentional measurement for the purpose of determining the distance of the sun from earth. However the loose correlation without such controls demonstrated to be in place gives me an even stronger hypothesis to test as more exact control will provide more exact results and given what we see is what we would expect if we tested with the inverse of control intentionally if the results were that the earth is flat and the sun is close upon intentional exact control.
Fateswebb ago
But dude wake up and look outside. If the Earth was flat the sun would not rise, it would come around... Why the fuck does it come out of the horizon? Why does it sink into the horizon at night? Sunset and sunrise prove the Earth isn't flat..
RickFlairWOOOOOO ago
https://youtu.be/Mgkz2I-oqYI
Example of vanishing point using the setting sun. They zoom in with a bad ass camera that anyone can buy that has super high zoom capability and the sun rises back up again, then when they zoom back out it sets again.... Vanishing point. you probably learned about it in art class.