You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SaneGoatiSwear ago

nathan?

naaaah

let me put it this way ever so simply and clearly:

you can spin a top, but that doesn't mean it's spinning of it's own accord.

or how about this: you can waterboard a horse, but that doesn't mean he's freely drinking?

any which way i put it,

just because you may be under the impression the rothschilds are for human self-regulation, doesn't make it true. and if they are, which they aren't, then they've failed miserably due to the means they employed to reach said ends.

inb4 muh cycle.

the rothchilds have it wrong. they all do.

been a little bit since i've seen someone shill for the oligarchs directly here. most of the shills stick to the elite theater.


and now let's just step back from this dog thing for a second.

you're now - correct me if i'm wrong - you're now talking as if there's a group above the oligarchs. who exactly?

he [the dog] needs to be on a leash when he is going to be around other people.

so the human is the dog, rothsyboi is the human... and the other people are.... other oligarchs?

are you kidding

we human slaves need leashes when we're around other oligarchs? well someone tell china to get their fucking dog tourists in line, they suck!

or are you saying aliens.

because for a half second there it sounded like aliens.

.... bot.