You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Tb0n3 ago

You can swear and promise all you like. It doesn't change the facts. Jet fuel can't melt steel beams, but you don't have to melt steel to weaken it significantly.

SaneGoatiSwear ago

yeah but if the planes hit the sides of the buildings (which video evidence and thousands of witness statements confirm), then the beams closer would have failed quicker, causing a toppling, not a perfect freefall-speed pancaking, which the core of the buildings were designed specifically to never let happen.

edit: by planes i mean the drone replacement 767s into the two towers,

Tb0n3 ago

The buildings were built around a central core. Maybe the damage to the central core allowed them to be compromised in the middle. But I don't know, and neither do you as we are not structural engineers.

SaneGoatiSwear ago

hahaha! bro, thousands of them have signed off on a statement saying the official nist report's cause is a physical impossibility without the best-placed thermitic charges in the history of controlled demolitions. i'm paraphrasing, but that's the gist.

the planes hit the sides of the building - taking 7g+ turns right before impact, both, to hit the sides. they specifically did not hit the central columns.

it doesn't account for the vaporization of dozens of floors, the missing dozens of feet of rubble afterwards, the perfect freefall descent into own footprint... molten steel/concrete, microspheres and thermitic residue found in all wtc dust samples...

Tb0n3 ago

Oh shit. You found aluminum after a plane crash? AMAZING!

SaneGoatiSwear ago

kek. thermitic residue. really easy to confuse with aluminuminuminuminum.

Tb0n3 ago

Seeing as thermite is fucking aluminum and iron oxide, yeah, it's pretty fucking retarded.

SaneGoatiSwear ago

just like diamond is the same thing as graphite.