CIA Pilot Swears Oath: Planes Did Not Bring Towers Down On 9/11

CIA Pilot Swears Oath: Planes Did Not Bring Towers Down On 9/11 (hiduth.com)

submitted 8.8 years ago by conspecs

28 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Tb0n3 8.8 years ago

You can swear and promise all you like. It doesn't change the facts. Jet fuel can't melt steel beams, but you don't have to melt steel to weaken it significantly.

link

GIF-lLL-S0NG 8.8 years ago

if you were right, the tops would have fallen and the lower 3/4s would not collapse because their steel was still at full strength.. the steel beams on the 10,20,30,40,50,60,70 floors were all at ambient room temperatures.

link

SaneGoatiSwear 8.8 years ago

this guy gets it. like chopping the top 1/5 of a tree off with a single very fast axe chop would not cause vaporization of the bottom 1/3 of the tree, and cause the top 1/5 to perfectly descend at freefall speeds pulverising perfectly the entire tree below it.

lol. some people just don't reality.

cheers, gif-ill.

link

SaneGoatiSwear 8.8 years ago

yeah but if the planes hit the sides of the buildings (which video evidence and thousands of witness statements confirm), then the beams closer would have failed quicker, causing a toppling, not a perfect freefall-speed pancaking, which the core of the buildings were designed specifically to never let happen.

edit: by planes i mean the drone replacement 767s into the two towers,

link

Tb0n3 8.8 years ago

The buildings were built around a central core. Maybe the damage to the central core allowed them to be compromised in the middle. But I don't know, and neither do you as we are not structural engineers.

link

SaneGoatiSwear 8.8 years ago

look after all this time if you've just accepted the official story and moved on that's your choice, i'm not here to rip you from it. if you want to know more, architects and engineers for 9/11 truth is a good place to start.

link

SaneGoatiSwear 8.8 years ago

hahaha! bro, thousands of them have signed off on a statement saying the official nist report's cause is a physical impossibility without the best-placed thermitic charges in the history of controlled demolitions. i'm paraphrasing, but that's the gist.

the planes hit the sides of the building - taking 7g+ turns right before impact, both, to hit the sides. they specifically did not hit the central columns.

it doesn't account for the vaporization of dozens of floors, the missing dozens of feet of rubble afterwards, the perfect freefall descent into own footprint... molten steel/concrete, microspheres and thermitic residue found in all wtc dust samples...