No. He made poor business decisions and got in bed with a private investor, which was subsequently bought by a prominent jew-owned investment conglomerate. Since Voat is extremely anti-jew (for obvious reasons), he was forced to distance himself from this project and abandoned it entirely, instead moving onto whatever EDON.GARDEN is, as his next project.
Voat's trademark has already expired and the voat.co/about page already shows EDON.GARDEN as owning the existing IP, and EDON.GARDEN is listed on the technology investment page for https://imperialfamily.com/
Most likey scenario is Justin and his team, who all abandoned Voat almost a year ago now, handed it off to a janitor - or possibly even just gave it to the feds to continue to monitor the dissident users here under project POGO's data collection program.
I already did. Multiple times. You've never denied any of them, and you and all the other jew worshiping pieces of shit use this same bullshit strategy every time when presented with the evidence. It gets so tiresome.
KAPE is partnered with London Trust Media (AKA Andrew Lee, the suspected Voat "Angel") in aquiring VPN and similar "privacy" technologies. http://www.londontrustmedia.com/
PIA invested in Voat, which explains the PIA advertising and the whole "take a picture with your Voat username for a VPN!" promotion in the past. This is the only thing that has no direct evidence and is educated speculation based upon simple correlation of all of the above.
It's really not complicated. Anyone can see for themselves. Why do you bother trying to lie about this?
It's buried in deeply nested comments and pm's. Sufficient to say they cooked it up using old unused page(s). Narrative is shit and has no leg to stand on. No need to waste any more energy on it, especially seeing that I was right about the parties pushing it being the 'conglomerate' of SBBH, PV/Kev, rPV/Amalek, Nomo, ES & co.
If they even believed their own horseshit, they'd have left the site long ago when they tried this under their previous narrative iteration(s). But they don't, so they haven't and won't.
Also says plenty that they're using antagonistic alts to push it, that this is a disingenuous effort aimed at 2 target audiences; us (to rile us up), and certain other folks who'll react predictably to any mention of jews out of habit (however warranted at times or otherwise). To repeat, it is so not worth wasting our time and energy on. I'm closing the book on this one.
Like I said, it's targeted at people who just upvote anything that is 'against jews', so some of those upvotes won't necessarily be vote manipulation, unless of course you count the use of manipulative narratives (preying on bias) to farm upvotes... /shrug
I mean, I get it, there's plenty of reason for some of it, but these guys pushing this narrative are just playing a tune they know others will dance to without taking the time to look at the particulars (like we did) in order to ascertain the legitimacy of the narrative.
Again, of course, if they truly believe the site is compromised, they'll make for the exit.
view the rest of the comments →
Cransch ago
No. He made poor business decisions and got in bed with a private investor, which was subsequently bought by a prominent jew-owned investment conglomerate. Since Voat is extremely anti-jew (for obvious reasons), he was forced to distance himself from this project and abandoned it entirely, instead moving onto whatever EDON.GARDEN is, as his next project.
Voat's trademark has already expired and the voat.co/about page already shows EDON.GARDEN as owning the existing IP, and EDON.GARDEN is listed on the technology investment page for https://imperialfamily.com/
Most likey scenario is Justin and his team, who all abandoned Voat almost a year ago now, handed it off to a janitor - or possibly even just gave it to the feds to continue to monitor the dissident users here under project POGO's data collection program.
Crensch ago
Debunked horseshit.
Cransch ago
Prove it.
Crensch ago
Prove your claims. That which can be presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Cransch ago
I already did. Multiple times. You've never denied any of them, and you and all the other jew worshiping pieces of shit use this same bullshit strategy every time when presented with the evidence. It gets so tiresome.
It's really not complicated. Anyone can see for themselves. Why do you bother trying to lie about this?
Crensch ago
@Madworld, @argosciv,@Vindicator
Do y'all have that link handy where you destroyed this narrative?
argosciv ago
It's buried in deeply nested comments and pm's. Sufficient to say they cooked it up using old unused page(s). Narrative is shit and has no leg to stand on. No need to waste any more energy on it, especially seeing that I was right about the parties pushing it being the 'conglomerate' of SBBH, PV/Kev, rPV/Amalek, Nomo, ES & co.
If they even believed their own horseshit, they'd have left the site long ago when they tried this under their previous narrative iteration(s). But they don't, so they haven't and won't.
Also says plenty that they're using antagonistic alts to push it, that this is a disingenuous effort aimed at 2 target audiences; us (to rile us up), and certain other folks who'll react predictably to any mention of jews out of habit (however warranted at times or otherwise). To repeat, it is so not worth wasting our time and energy on. I'm closing the book on this one.
@Vindicator @MadWorld @PuttItOut
MadWorld ago
Another wave of vote manipulation just arrived. On the bright side, I can collect those shit accounts :-)
argosciv ago
No kidding... they hit your above comment with a -1 in under 4.6 mins.
MadWorld ago
Notice the ratio of highest comment upvotes and the submission upvotes. They are not even hiding, nice the spikes.
argosciv ago
Like I said, it's targeted at people who just upvote anything that is 'against jews', so some of those upvotes won't necessarily be vote manipulation, unless of course you count the use of manipulative narratives (preying on bias) to farm upvotes... /shrug
I mean, I get it, there's plenty of reason for some of it, but these guys pushing this narrative are just playing a tune they know others will dance to without taking the time to look at the particulars (like we did) in order to ascertain the legitimacy of the narrative.
Again, of course, if they truly believe the site is compromised, they'll make for the exit.