You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

17898023? ago

Hello, /pol/. I've been going through commie subreddits lately, if you completely ignore the blatant anti-White and degenerate rhetoric, you might realize something about them. Sometimes, I get the feeling that these people would have been actual National Socialists in another timeline considering how both Hitler and Mussolini hated liberalism and capitalism, if not for their hatred for the traditional family structure in which normalfag society calls "heterosexuality". It's just that they hate liberalism and capitalism for somewhat completely different reasons, reasons that tend to be filled to the brim with artificial identity politics. For example, they think the idea of advocating proper sex roles and a healthy lifestyle is somehow a form of "White supremacy" and "toxic masculinity". To them, this is a sign of "capitalism" "oppressing" them. I've figured they don't even understand these terms, try just use it to justify their sexual deviancy as "normal". I shouldn't normally praise them for anything, but I don't remember the commies of old wanting to "smash the patriarchy" in the name of revolution.

In truth, however, you could say their support for feminism, trannyism, and homosexuality should be a "reactionary" idea, considering how the Soviet Union considered homosexuality as a form of "fascism". These people are completely lost in the political scene, they fail to realize that most of their "comrades" aren't even part of the working class. If you remember Bahar Mustafa, it turns out her family makes £600,000 a month, more than the average Brit could ever make in his/her lifetime. Yet everyone around her considered her "oppressed" because she had a vagina. Western commies in my own understanding, are unintentionally supporting degenerate ideas that should be considered as a form of liberal secularism. They are the main followers of SJWism, after all. "Thin privilege" is apparently a thing now. In conclusion, they would have meant very well right from the start, it's just that they were too weak-minded to make better of themselves. In the case of one of their claims that "White people don't have culture", it's practically rooted on their blatant arrogance, ignorance, and stupidity. Because I guess Europe and the Ancient Greeks and Roman's never existed. In the case of their belief of "cultural appropriation", it's just simple intellectual inconsistency. They have no problem with non-Whites living in the West appropriating the English language, or any other European language like Spanish and French.

17899920? ago

Yes, anti-capitalists are usually either socialists or anarchists. I think you're strawmanning liberalism here. If you want to own the libs, you have to understand what they actually believe. According to them, women's oppression has less to do with capitalism per se and more to do with the fact that they were historically denied basic rights like being able to vote and go to college, and are still socially stigmatized in traditionally male-dominated jobs. It's kind of like how niggers were enslaved and then "separate but equal" until a couple generations ago. Even if today's cucked white man isn't the oppressor, it doesn't mean oppression wasn't historically real and the effects are still playing out.

17899921? ago

Natural Order, and Social Hierarchy are not "oppression", you gender studies hooker.

None of you will ever be equal, let alone "separate but equal".

Shut the fuck up, and get back in the kitchen.

Raise babies, and smile for your man.