QTDDTOT: Questions that don’t deserve their own thread
This is the thread for one-liner questions about /pol/-related topics. “What does /pol/ think of [x],” “is [x] redpilled,” and associated questions belong here. Threads created based on a single, simple question will be deleted. If your thread is deleted, come here and ask again. REMINDER TO SEARCH THE CATALOG FIRST.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12021208.html
view the rest of the comments →
17556084? ago
Does anyone have any idea what scientific study, or which anthropologists spearheaded a successful study in disproving the traditional Darwin theory of "sexual liberty" and mixing among a species? The study essentially found that, among humans, ethnically homogeneous societies, in which the men remained sexual reserved, rather than sexual liberal, managed to combat decadence/degeneracy successfully and develop their respective society much more effectively than mixed and sexually liberal societies.
17556086? ago
Please indicate where Darwin proposed any such system as "Sexual Liberty" and verify that you aren't (((misrepresenting))) the actual proposal.
17556958? ago
Furthermore. By Sexual Liberty, I am referring to ignoring rules of celibacy. There is a work that mentions some of these trends, "Celibacy, Culture, And Society: Anthropology Of Sexual Abstinence"
17556957? ago
Darwin did not propose Sexual Liberty, I wanted to simplify the post, but I knew this would happen. Darwin's theory proposed that animal species, not human ones, acquired greater success in their respect environments by mixing with as many variants of their species, and as frequently as possible. Such actions result in a wide variety of genes in a single species, with a large quantity of them, therefore making the species more resistant to mother nature. I saw the post a while I ago, although I believe it negates the idea simply because Humans are exceptions to animals. I'll post again with sources if I find any good ones, also don't assume I'm a kike.