QTDDTOT: Questions that don’t deserve their own thread
This is the thread for one-liner questions about /pol/-related topics. “What does /pol/ think of [x],” “is [x] redpilled,” and associated questions belong here. Threads created based on a single, simple question will be deleted. If your thread is deleted, come here and ask again. REMINDER TO SEARCH THE CATALOG FIRST.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12021208.html
view the rest of the comments →
17278744? ago
I have a theory that I think is true and that other anons would agree with.
The age of consent is meant to keep young men away from young women and in effect prevent the formation of healthy families.
I'm primarily saying this for 18+ AoC.
I feel this serves 2 purposes, 1. as previously stated, to keep would be young couples apart, and to harshly punish the males who go against this ultimatum. And 2. allow (((rich old fucks))) to get a fresh supply of single women that have reached the AoC.
The reason that I've heard for the AoC is to keep those old fucks away from young women as much as possible, but that hardly works as there is a lot of evidence that it does not, prime example, the subway advertisement jew.
I'm not sure if any of that was coherent, but I think it's just another tool to destroy young white men (because no other race would conform to such a law) and in a healthy society those other races would be non-existent, and there would be reasonable cultural limits in place to ensure healthy young marriages, and prevent pedophillic degeneracy from older men
17278747? ago
i do agree. there should be an age limit buffer of 2 or 3 years so that legally it is safer for young couples.
17283347? ago
Nah, I think the buffer should be a bit wider. Maybe 5 years.
Or, start the buffer at 2-3 years at 18, then incrementally increase it as you get older. Of course set a limit to the buffer so that 25 year olds aren't dating 16 year olds.