You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

17046911? ago

I'm not buying the idea that Hitler "supported Lehi and Zionism" to be honest. The idea that he had anything to do with Israel is downright stupid once you realize that Lehi started to support "National Bolshevism" along with Stalin's support. Here's some contrast to the false accusation. Avraham Stern, the founder of Lehi, once said "no difference existed between Hitler and Chamberlain, between Dachau or Buchenwald and sealing the gates of Eretz Israel." Keep this in mind every time someone tells you otherwise. He even called the Brits as "enemies of the Jewish people" while the National Socialists of the Third Reich were "Jew haters", who were obviously also enemies. The Zionist kikes never considered Hitler as an ally, they just thought of him as a great asset against The Eternal Anglo since at that time they were the occupiers of Palestine. (((They))) wanted Palestine for themselves, and (((they))) thought that ye ol' divide and conquer was going to work on him. That never came to light however, as within the course of Hitler's life, he went on to support Palestine instead, along with other Muslims from Bosnia to Turkey. Here's a webm and some pics for reference, these have been posted many times by me and others before in /pol/, but it will always give you some insight on Hitler's view of the world. As I was saying, when support from him was out of reach, this resulted into Lehi resorting to support Stalin and his kike regime instead, like I mentioned before. It does make sense why the Alt-Kike would support "National Bolshevism". It fits their subversive tactics very well.

17049063? ago

Its disinformation

17054171? ago

Ralph Grandinetti

According to Michael Collins Piper, he found a confirmation of The Protocols in some jewish publication, but his files disappeared after his death.

17058459? ago

The protocols don't have to be real, because the Talmud IS.

17058462? ago

That's not the point; the fact that his research shows that they are legitimate, is.

>>12858606

You won't fool anyone.

17058463? ago

They're clearly plagiarized from an 1856 French work. I've written a book with this shit in mind. You're far better off not using the Protocols themselves as your "evidence" for any given point, because they themselves aren't verifiable. What IS verifiable is what Ford said Do you have a link to the source for that quote? Because I've only found a quote that is worded completely differently. It's important to match not just the spirit, but the letter of a person's quote., what the Talmud says, and what jews themselves have admitted to saying.

Take another example, the "blood libel." It's universally heralded as… libel. A hoax, a lie, just antisemitic claptrap. They say that the stories are entirely fabricated and that the jews were either accused of what others did or were just scapegoated and the crimes didn't happen. And without modern medical autopsies or any form of forensic evidence, these individual cases can be brushed under the rug.

But when you look at what's being said and how it's being said, you start to ask questions. Such as, "Why did medieval nations who never had contact with one another–who were enemies, even–report stories about jews with identical events happening between them?" And while most jews themselves actively reject the "blood libel," it only takes a handful who admit it to throw the whole damn thing into question. Like a jewish doctor who wrote an entire fucking book on the subject and admits it.

https://www.scribd.com/document/330147501/Blood-Passover OR BERNARD LAZARE HIMSELF.

“It was born at first from this widespread idea that the jew was fatally urged each year to reproduce figuratively, at the same time, the murder of Christ; For this reason, in the legendary acts of martyred children, one always shows the victim crucified and suffering the punishment of Jesus, sometimes even, it is represented crowned with thorns and pierced flank. To this general belief were added the prejudices, often justified, against the jews devoted to magical practices. Indeed, in the Middle Ages, the jew was considered by the people as the magician par excellence, in fact, some jews indulged in magic; there are many formulas of exorcism in the Talmud, and Talmudic and Kabbalistic demonology is very complicated. Now, we know the place that the blood always occupied in the operations of witchcraft… Blood, especially virgin blood, was attributed to unheard-of virtues; the blood was a healer, evocative, preservative; it could be used for the search for the philosopher's stone, for the composition of potions and enchantments. Now, it is very probable, even certain, that jewish magicians had to sacrifice children; from there, the formation of the legend of the ritual sacrifice. It is stated that the jewish religion, which approved the crucifixion of Christ, furthermore recommended the spreading of Christian blood, and they sought stubbornly Talmudic and Kabbalistic that can justify such assertions.”

~ ✡Bernard Lazare✡; L’Antisémitisme, son histoire et ses causes, pp. 354-6; 1894

17265157? ago

They're clearly plagiarized from an 1856 French work

The fact is, KIKES plagiarized Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu and then jews, specifically the ADL, claim it was "fabricated against them". Theodore Herzl plagiarized that piece at the First Zionist Congress held at Basle in 1897. That is AFTER the year 1856. The knowledge of the Protocols spread throughout Germany because Germans were told the truth that

JEWS LIE

Thus kikes could not effectively claim that plagairism equals fabrication against them, because it does not.

"blood libel"

They say that the stories are entirely fabricated and that the jews were either

accused of what others did or were just scapegoated and the crimes didn't happen.

They say this about everything. Continue on blaming the hooknosed faggots for what they actually did.

17266218? ago

Of course. The source of the Protocols is irrelevant. The providence of its contents is all that matters.

>>12899328

third image

There's no source for that. "A transcript of a conversation that someone overheard" isn't acceptable as a source.

17264047? ago

They're clearly plagiarized from an 1856 French work.

which?

17264049? ago

Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu. Not in full, but in part.

17059484? ago

No and I don't use the Protocols, I hold the same view as is Ford's comment.

17057250? ago

According to this fat CIA psyop faggot, he found a confirmation of The Protocols in some jewish publication, but his files disappeared after his death.

17058461? ago

the thezog.info schizo is back here again

I swear to G-d he obviously doesn't belong here. In fact, he only comes here hoping that anyone will believe him. He just circlejerks on his own arguments. To him, it's not the Jews, it's the CIA/FBI/insert Alphabet agency here, and everyone is an agent is an agent including his own family. Even though every single one of these said Alphabet agencies are Jewish to the core, he never acknowledges this. What a complete retard.