QTDDTOT: Questions that don't deserve their own thread (8chan)

submitted ago by 2969519?

QTDDTOT: Questions that don’t deserve their own thread

This is the thread for one-liner questions about /pol/-related topics. “What does /pol/ think of [x],” “is [x] redpilled,” and associated questions belong here. Threads created based on a single, simple question will be deleted. If your thread is deleted, come here and ask again. REMINDER TO SEARCH THE CATALOG FIRST.  

OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12021208.html  

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

17022123? ago

I'm looking for some reliable redpill material that can BTFO specifically the "social constructionist" tenet of the marxist faggotry in a clear and concise manner. Articles that are easy for normalfags to digest are best. What have you had success with?  

17023093? ago

What do you mean specifically? They apply this conception (relativism) to literally everything, so if you're going to prove any specific point wrong you just have to have the hard data against it.  

17023094? ago

Specifically this flavor of bullshit:

“The social constructionist perspective […] affirms that masculinities and gender norms are: (1) socially constructed (rather than being biologically driven), (2) vary across historical and local contexts and (3) interact with other factors such as poverty and globalization. In a social constructionist perspective, gender norms emerge from prevailing patterns of hegemony and patriarchy and are in turn reinforced and reconstructed by families, communities and social institutions.” See Ricardo C., Barker, G. Men (2008). Men, Masculinities, Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Violence.  

17023833? ago

Oh! Well, that's obvious. Biology drives hormone production, which drives neurology, from which is derived psychology. The physiological differences in the brains of men and women are easily proven. Take what will be perhaps the last "freebie" from my book. Feel free to use the citations therein for your own uses.  

 

17023837? ago

Right, of course! It was obvious to me why, but I lacked the proper words to explain it. Thank you very much.