You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

16832523? ago

Do leftists even have a solid argument that strict border control isn't needed beyond "Muh separated families!!!"? At this point, they're not even trying to hide the fact that they actually want open borders and globalism. They are playing by the hands of (((corporations))), by the way. (((Corporations))) love open borders because it gives them cheap labor from spics and spiclets. How are they not noticing this? How subhuman can you be to not notice it?

Besides, it's not like any American "conservative" is even remotely against legal immigration, at times they just disagree with illegal immigration, to the left they are also considered as "Nazis". How will they react when they see an actual conservative? For example, Pat Buchanan is more conservative than the entire GOP, and yet he is more critical about Pissrael's wars against the Middle East and he's inherently anti-war and anti-interventionist. However, since he doesn't support the left's ideals, suddenly he's also a "Nazi". Why does the left think that's a good counter argument against their political enemies?

16833383? ago

You're looking at it wrong. That's one of the major problems in the early redpilling stage–continuing to view the jews and their puppets as "normal people who just don't know the truth, and so if we can show them the 'error of their ways,' they can be changed." Their argument is "white genocide." Anything which facilitates that is what they want. Anything which does not is what must be removed. They don't care about law. They don't care about rules. They don't care about facts. They don't believe that truth itself exists, and so there are no "negatives" to anything which is harmful to the native population of the West.