QTDDTOT: Questions that don’t deserve their own thread
This is the thread for one-liner questions about /pol/-related topics. “What does /pol/ think of [x],” “is [x] redpilled,” and associated questions belong here. Threads created based on a single, simple question will be deleted. If your thread is deleted, come here and ask again. REMINDER TO SEARCH THE CATALOG FIRST.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/12021208.html
view the rest of the comments →
16688726? ago
16688728? ago
Perhaps a brief segment from my book? Still writing it, so please excuse the formatting lines.
A lot of the problem stems from misuse of the definition of words, and from the suppression of scientific knowledge. What we call "races" (caucasoids, mongoloids, negroids, americoids, and australoids) are entirely separate species, as defined by their genetics. Within these "races" there are true subspecies (with a large enough genetic distance to be defined as such) and "ethnicities", which are simple groups within subspecies. For negroes, these group distances are pretty big. For whites, however, there's virtually ZERO FST (genetic distance) between them. Jews, genetically, are a subspecies of the caucasoid species. I've taken to calling it Homo europeansis, so jews would likely be Homo europeansis judaica. The others are Homo europeansis europeansis and Homo europeansis arabica.
16691028? ago
Impressive. Very nice.
One thing I'll ask, is please cite sources in footnotes or something. I'm sure it's easy to do with an office app or LaTeX or R-Markdown or whatever you're using; it would really help to be able to have sources in hand both for verifiability and to be able to dig deeper into a subject you cover. It might help you too, to keep track of why/when/where/who of various claims and when you want to expand on a subject.
You're doing God's work.
16694951? ago
It’ll be an e-book. All the red text is clickable citation. I didn’t want to interrupt the flow, but at the same time didn’t want a totally uncited book like Defensive Racism.