You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

King_Freya ago

Yeah, no. I went through chemotherapy when I was 2. One of 4 kids in the US to have the cancer I did at the time. Chemo and surgery to remove the tumor was what saved me. 40% chance of surviving it and here I am decades later. Chemo is shit, but so is cancer and I’d do it again if I had to.

Cannot wait to see the responses to this.

worldofmadness ago

Just because you had chemo and you managed to survive the treatment and get rid of the cancer does not equal to chemo being not dangerous and being effective. That is like saying vaccines are not toxic because you didn't get damaged by it.

You can not just ignore all the people who died because of the chemo treatment, all the people who had their cancer return more aggressively because of chemo, and ignore all the people who chemo did not work for. Nor can you say that they would have died because of their cancer anyway if they didn't get chemo because you do not know that. Also the article I cited which in some hospitals, 50% of cancer patients died to chemo and not their cancer, is pretty damning and can not be overlooked. But If you do not agree with my conclusion, that's fine, but you haven't dismissed anything on my post.

There are many other examples of people getting rid of their cancer without chemo, they didn't have to go through hell and risk dying to this deadly and devastating treatment to get rid of their cancer.

My mother's friend was diagnosed with cancer, doctor told her she only had a few months to live and chemo would extent her life by a little bit. She refused the treatment. Guess what? Been years and she's still alive

King_Freya ago

Look at my other replies. I don’t deny how terrible chemo is for the body. Doesn’t mean it isn’t viable. Not everything is a jewish plot.

The same logic you use in the beginning of your reply could be did for your mothers friend.

It’s why I hate statements like “We finally understand how X works.”

It’ll be a looooong time before we fully understand the human body and how to effectively treat it.

Chemo works for some, not for others, while some people might not need it at all, but in the end, we still don’t truly know why and which option is the best for each person. Health is individual as they say.

worldofmadness ago

Jews are not allowed to treat or cure gentiles, only allowed to poision them which is exactly what chemotherapy does. Of course chemotherapy has the ability to kill cancer because chemo is such a toxin that it kills every cell it faces, including cancer cells. You just got to hope the chemo kills the cancer before it kills you, why take that chance and why should we still rely on such a deadly treatment after all these years? Also, chemotherapy destroys the immune system, the immune system is needed to kill of mutated cells before they turn into tumors so with chemotherapy, you can actually get cancer because of it. Also let's not forget that many cancer patients recieve both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Radiotherapy is another deadly treatment that causes irreversible damage to the body.

Obviously this is a jewish plot because it does two things;

1. Poison the gentile

2. Make tons of profit

These two have been there M.O for a long time. Also, i've made it quite clear in my post that since the very start, jews were behind chemotherapy and you must be very naive if you believe it's for the good of our health, nothing these bastards have done has ever been good.

There's already been studies made on turmeric and blueberries anti-cancerous properties and they've shown tons of potential for real cures.

Do you know why India has a low prevalence of colon cancer in comparasion to Europe? Because their diet consists of a lot of turmeric and ginger, both are highly anti-cancerous and they work mostly around the colon area.

However the jew-run cancer industry is not interested in cures so such studies do not get any attention or funding for further studies.. So yes, it is a conspiracy, a JEW conspiracy.