So, to be clear, it archives the original thumbnail from a link? And Obama tweeted something completely unrelated, but included a picture on his website of a nigger that would be killed a few days later? And Twitter grabbed that picture?
I really do believe this is being used for political purpose, if not orchestrated all together, but this just isn't evidence.
BoraxTheFungarian ago
Does thr Obama.org banner change when they change their website?
Cant_Call_It ago
It did for this mess. Go to the link and click "Our mission."
Edit: Nevermind. They've changed it which is kind of weird.
Drain0 ago
All banners linked to websites do apparently.
Cant_Call_It ago
The link was posted on that date then the picture at the link was changed later. Nothing here.
shitface9000 ago
This explanation has already been debunked. Tweets preserve the image at time of capture.
OF really did post this one week before the incident.
Cant_Call_It ago
I find that hard to believe. If that's the case then this picture would have had to have been on obama.org on that date. Is there any proof of that?
shitface9000 ago
That's how Twitter works and has always worked that way.
Cant_Call_It ago
So, to be clear, it archives the original thumbnail from a link? And Obama tweeted something completely unrelated, but included a picture on his website of a nigger that would be killed a few days later? And Twitter grabbed that picture?
I really do believe this is being used for political purpose, if not orchestrated all together, but this just isn't evidence.
shitface9000 ago
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3862644
shitface9000 ago
It’s from the obama foundation. They had an image of floyd on their page and tweeted it. That captured the page in that moment and preserved it.