I've been trying to determine if there's any truth to this. I've watched vidoes of Icke, Dana Ashlie and others explain how this supposedly works. While the arguments are interesting, I'm skeptical of this theory and I'll tell you why.
The theory as I understand it is that 60GHz millimeter waves inhibit the body's ability to uptake oxygen which causes a person to slowly suffocate and die. The theory is that there is no virus or actual illness going around; what we're seeing is 5G sickness and this explains the dry cough and supposed lack of phlegm in the lungs which is always present in pneumonia caused by typical flu.
My skepticism comes from my understanding of how 5G actually works. 4G cell towers and other devices which use RF to communicate do so by emitting pulsed omnidirectional signals. Think of an expanding soap bubble which is invisble. Now, 5G towers emit constant 4G signals UNTIL a device requests a 5G signal. At this point the tower does something called beamforming, which focuses microwave radiation in a tight band like a laser in the higher GHz range, to hone in on the device and transfer information at very high speeds.
Interestingly, and ominously, Active Denial Systems, which are used for dispersing crowds, employ this same beamforming tech at 95GHz to create burning sensations on the skin. I believe 5G has weapon potential but that's beyond the scope of this topic. I mention it to highlight the beamforming aspect of the tech.
Now, for the COVID19 = 5G illness theory to be true, it would mean that every person who is sick would have to be individually targeted by 5G towers wherever they went with beamformed 60Ghz waves until they died. There would also be no recovered cases because there would be no defense against this, unless that person was removed from an area that has 5G. And obviously the 60GHz signal isn't being pulsed omnidirectionally like 4g or else everyone would be suffocating with "covid", and that clearly isn't happening.
So logically this theory doesn't seem to work. I could very well have some facts wrong; 5G is a complex and multifaceted issue. I'd like to hear other opinions or criticisms. I do know one thing - the media is having a field day painting anyone who opposes 5G as lunatics who believe it's causing "the virus", and any other aspect or valid concerns about this technology is completely ignored.
view the rest of the comments →
TheyLie ago
Thank you for the discussion.
"... 5G has weapon potential.. " should raise a red flag - - it's being put everywhere.
If the mainstream is mocking it, it means pavlovs dogs are being trained to laugh at the truth. This is always an indicator to keep digging in that area, keep gathering information.
What of the cancer clusters? Just a coincidence?
Are you aware of what went on in China? I don't think they genocide that many people for benign reasons.
Perhaps, like you said, potential weapon... 5g might be whatever they decide it to be... A surveillance tool and if they notice persons doing or speaking what they don't want, a weapon. Perfect control, full blown enslavement.
thousand-year_ban ago
I have heard of cancer clusters in close proximity to cell towers, but I'll admit this isn't an issue I've really looked in to. I also remember a story of childhood leukemia spiking after a new radio tower was installed near a residential district. I believe this was in California. Hazy on the details. If you know of any disease cluster studies relating to 5G I'd love to take a look.
TheyLie ago
I doubt that having any tower electrical, 4g or 5g over a school or a home is a good idea.
Studies... You always need to wonder about this. Who published. Did they alter, who paid for, was it independent. They're always fucking with these.
Better to just see the actual stories of people who were affected.