Posted automatically (#81831) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Joe_McCarthy: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @TrialsAndTribulation)
I did indeed do that deliberately. A NSFW tag would have obscured the hook that is the image of her. Voat is NSFW. This place looks like a concentration camp.
Voat is not free speech. Don't be silly. Downvoting and the ability to limit one's ability by knocking into negatives for posting, say, porn makes a mockery of that idea.
I consider this thread something of an exception though. I may do it again but she is so hot here that she needed the widest possible, erm, exposure.
Quit your pilpul, you know what I mean. You can post whatever you want without having your content deleted and being banned. But you say that you'll ban people that exercise their freedom of speech off your sub, by posting pornography to your sub or being mean to you.
I have the capacity to ban people in my sub if they do something I don't like, yes. All part of the established system here. But there is no requirement that I use a NSFW tag in whatever. I can plaster hot blondes all over the sub if I want. Kinda bad netiquette - but not against the rules.
It's not a written rule, but you are expected to tick that fucking box when you post pornography. It's also part of being in this community, as some people block nsfw content. By deciding not to tick the box, you force them to see your pornography. If you think it is fine for people to force their content on others, remove all rules on your sub right now otherwise, you are being hypocritical.
Most of your post there is pretty reasonable. Being reasonable is a change of pace for you. Hence the poor netiquette. I reserve the option to do it though. People seem to do what they want around here. If it is within the rules.
Comparing it to my sub rules though is apples and oranges.
People specifically have the option to curate their own subs and ban those who they think are disrupting. I get to make rules to ban if I want to. But I am not flouting any actual rule in posting this chick very visibly in the throes of masturbatory orgasm.
I could change my sub rules to allow her to be posted there. But is that necessary? People are accustomed to it not being a porn sub. Changing it now would also be poor netiquette.
I mean, surely you can reason through the implications here just like I'm doing.
As a practical matter she is more likely to be seen in this sub anyway. So there is that. Whether to post porn at all is also a value judgment. Taking the additional step of ditching the NSFW tag even is. I could argue, even if not particularly strongly, that people can deal with seeing naked girls on the front page of this sub. I think they do anyway even in clicking on the sub itself. It's in new where the NSFW tag is mostly a filter.
But of course some have objections to any kind of pornography. I do respect that. On the other hand there is a lot of stuff on Voat that many people will object to. The majority here just likes it. The bitching from you and others stems from some deep hostility to porn - for whatever reason. I'm not altogether unsympathetic but I have a more nuanced view.
You are conflating rules with values here. If people break my sub rules I can ban them. They can't ban me though for not using NSFW tags in whatever. Some would like to though. Or for posting porn at all.
Fucking kike right there. Both those terms, in this context, are interpreted as principle. So, why is your sub any different? I'll add on top of that, why is it bad that goats, member of this community downvote you when you break their rules, value, principle?
You are a disgusting being. I hope you get killed after a nigger robs you.
What is most clearly bad with downvoting me is in how this is supposed to be a free speech site yet I can be effectively silenced by what amounts to people who don't actually believe in free speech gaming the rigging here. That is the most flagrant abuse here. Though obviously I don't like getting mass downvoted as a thing in itself. Mostly it is for purely political speech even. The Jew haters are mostly retards that cannot stand up to me whatsover. Downvoting is a weapon of the weak.
As a practical matter my sub only bans blatant trespasses. A guy basically has had to tell me to fuck off and keep at it to get banned. Your idea of speech apparently discounts any need for order or civility. That is an absurd view.
Meanwhile, I'm posting a hot girl fingering herself. Therr is no disorder or incivility between posters in that. Arguably obscenity but I'm not charging in with personal attacks or cussing people out. You don't have to like it. Or even really watch it. You also don't have to enter my sub. It is one sub. Fairly easy to avoid.
Ultimately you might even ask yourself why you are so offended by her. Girl is fucking hot dude. Relax.
None of this involves fags, nigger fucking, or Jews that I can see. I'm unsure who produced the video this is taken from. And contrary to what you retards think it is not a foregone conclusion a Jewish company produced it.
You're right that I am using this as a weapon though. In part. But not a Jewish weapon. I'm not Jewish. For the five millionth time. Dumbass.
It's the same line of thought that causes miscegenation, homosexuality, pornography, etc. All pushed by jews. If you walk like a duck, quack like a duck… the rope is waiting for you.
I'm not Jewish. And none of this involves fags or interracial sex. If I wanted to post niggers fucking white women I'd do so.
This is more like an expression of white supremacy. Or specifically white female aesthetic supremacy. I find her very inspiring. You might too if you weren't preoccupied with looking for Jews in cloud formations and in your sweat socks.
SearchVoatBot ago
This submission was linked from this v/whatever comment by @TrialsAndTribulation.
Posted automatically (#81831) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Joe_McCarthy: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @TrialsAndTribulation)
Joe_McCarthy ago
Now at almost 600 views. Impressive numbers for a bunch of whiners.
The other two copies of this thread are also in the hundreds.
beece ago
Liked it, downvoated anyway as it's bullshit you didn't put NSFW in the title.
Joe_McCarthy ago
I did indeed do that deliberately. A NSFW tag would have obscured the hook that is the image of her. Voat is NSFW. This place looks like a concentration camp.
scandalous-goat ago
Voat is free speech AND nsfw, can I post porn to your precious sub, then?
Joe_McCarthy ago
Voat is not free speech. Don't be silly. Downvoting and the ability to limit one's ability by knocking into negatives for posting, say, porn makes a mockery of that idea.
I consider this thread something of an exception though. I may do it again but she is so hot here that she needed the widest possible, erm, exposure.
Merry Christmas.
scandalous-goat ago
Quit your pilpul, you know what I mean. You can post whatever you want without having your content deleted and being banned. But you say that you'll ban people that exercise their freedom of speech off your sub, by posting pornography to your sub or being mean to you.
Joe_McCarthy ago
I have the capacity to ban people in my sub if they do something I don't like, yes. All part of the established system here. But there is no requirement that I use a NSFW tag in whatever. I can plaster hot blondes all over the sub if I want. Kinda bad netiquette - but not against the rules.
So yours is apples and oranges.
scandalous-goat ago
It's not a written rule, but you are expected to tick that fucking box when you post pornography. It's also part of being in this community, as some people block nsfw content. By deciding not to tick the box, you force them to see your pornography. If you think it is fine for people to force their content on others, remove all rules on your sub right now otherwise, you are being hypocritical.
Joe_McCarthy ago
Most of your post there is pretty reasonable. Being reasonable is a change of pace for you. Hence the poor netiquette. I reserve the option to do it though. People seem to do what they want around here. If it is within the rules.
Comparing it to my sub rules though is apples and oranges.
scandalous-goat ago
Why? What's so special about it?
Joe_McCarthy ago
People specifically have the option to curate their own subs and ban those who they think are disrupting. I get to make rules to ban if I want to. But I am not flouting any actual rule in posting this chick very visibly in the throes of masturbatory orgasm.
I could change my sub rules to allow her to be posted there. But is that necessary? People are accustomed to it not being a porn sub. Changing it now would also be poor netiquette.
I mean, surely you can reason through the implications here just like I'm doing.
As a practical matter she is more likely to be seen in this sub anyway. So there is that. Whether to post porn at all is also a value judgment. Taking the additional step of ditching the NSFW tag even is. I could argue, even if not particularly strongly, that people can deal with seeing naked girls on the front page of this sub. I think they do anyway even in clicking on the sub itself. It's in new where the NSFW tag is mostly a filter.
But of course some have objections to any kind of pornography. I do respect that. On the other hand there is a lot of stuff on Voat that many people will object to. The majority here just likes it. The bitching from you and others stems from some deep hostility to porn - for whatever reason. I'm not altogether unsympathetic but I have a more nuanced view.
scandalous-goat ago
You didn't answer my question. What's so special about your sub?
Joe_McCarthy ago
I answered why I don't want gifs of hot girls fucking themselves in it. That is sufficient.
scandalous-goat ago
No it's not. You have no respect for your fellow goats and their rules, why should anyone respect yours?
Joe_McCarthy ago
You are conflating rules with values here. If people break my sub rules I can ban them. They can't ban me though for not using NSFW tags in whatever. Some would like to though. Or for posting porn at all.
scandalous-goat ago
Fucking kike right there. Both those terms, in this context, are interpreted as principle. So, why is your sub any different? I'll add on top of that, why is it bad that goats, member of this community downvote you when you break their rules, value, principle?
You are a disgusting being. I hope you get killed after a nigger robs you.
Joe_McCarthy ago
What is most clearly bad with downvoting me is in how this is supposed to be a free speech site yet I can be effectively silenced by what amounts to people who don't actually believe in free speech gaming the rigging here. That is the most flagrant abuse here. Though obviously I don't like getting mass downvoted as a thing in itself. Mostly it is for purely political speech even. The Jew haters are mostly retards that cannot stand up to me whatsover. Downvoting is a weapon of the weak.
scandalous-goat ago
Yet, you silence those who exercise their freedom of speech.
You don't answer questions. The tricks you try to do is a weapon of the weak and the jews.
Joe_McCarthy ago
As a practical matter my sub only bans blatant trespasses. A guy basically has had to tell me to fuck off and keep at it to get banned. Your idea of speech apparently discounts any need for order or civility. That is an absurd view.
Meanwhile, I'm posting a hot girl fingering herself. Therr is no disorder or incivility between posters in that. Arguably obscenity but I'm not charging in with personal attacks or cussing people out. You don't have to like it. Or even really watch it. You also don't have to enter my sub. It is one sub. Fairly easy to avoid.
Ultimately you might even ask yourself why you are so offended by her. Girl is fucking hot dude. Relax.
scandalous-goat ago
Why are you offended if you daughter is fucking with a nigger? asks the jew
Why are you offended if your son is a faggot? asks the jew
Why are you offended by pornography? asks the jew, while using pornography as a weapon elsewhere.
Kill yourself, jew. Nothing you say is sincere, you truly are a parasite.
Joe_McCarthy ago
None of this involves fags, nigger fucking, or Jews that I can see. I'm unsure who produced the video this is taken from. And contrary to what you retards think it is not a foregone conclusion a Jewish company produced it.
You're right that I am using this as a weapon though. In part. But not a Jewish weapon. I'm not Jewish. For the five millionth time. Dumbass.
scandalous-goat ago
It's the same line of thought that causes miscegenation, homosexuality, pornography, etc. All pushed by jews. If you walk like a duck, quack like a duck… the rope is waiting for you.
Joe_McCarthy ago
I'm not Jewish. And none of this involves fags or interracial sex. If I wanted to post niggers fucking white women I'd do so.
This is more like an expression of white supremacy. Or specifically white female aesthetic supremacy. I find her very inspiring. You might too if you weren't preoccupied with looking for Jews in cloud formations and in your sweat socks.
scandalous-goat ago
Every single word you write is a lie.
XSS1337 ago
A glow nigger ... gotcha thanks.
New-World-Ebola ago
jew mccarthy... i hope you get stabbed to death.
yids_rape_kids ago
Oh hey i see the forum kike is back at it...
ggolemg ago
Jew poison.
Joe_McCarthy ago
She's Anglo-Saxon from all indications.
derram ago
mobile link: https://giant.gfycat.com/insecurefluffyfruitbat.webm
This has been an automated message.
ShitskinsFuckCorpses ago
God damn I want her to fart in my nostrils
Joe_McCarthy ago
Kind of a unique fetish. I guess my thoughts wander toward the more conventional here.