@Crensch is a Moral Relatavist (whatever)

submitted ago by NOMOCHOMO

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20633074

Both mods can be right and can see different things because they are different people.

@Crensch is clearly a (((moral relatavist)))

And fuck the fags who will say I'm stirring up drama. The faggot banned me from pizzagate (only reason I joined voat), then replied to my comments so I couldn't defend myself.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

NOMOCHOMO ago

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3432234/20637345

Then I assume you will reverse my ban, as the post in question has since been proven relevant to pizzagate?

My ban for "relevance" makes no sense if the post is now deemed relevant.

Rule Violation in v/pizzagate: 1: Relevance; Description: Causing problems with the removal of things that have not been proven to be pizzagate. Using divisive tactics against the mods. Arguing dishonestly, even after being warned that this was not a joke. Constant pattern of disruptive behavior and supporting users like esoteric