That's really not a big deal. If you think a 17 year old fucking anybody is bad then you are bluepilled. There is no actual argument for "young fertile women who are fully physically developed should not have sex" other than "I don't like it". Age of consent only exists because feminism has prevented fathers from making decisions about whom their daughters spread for, so they try to use the state to help them out. But even then it's nonsensical, because a young woman is much better off fucking an established older man who is capable of forming a family with her. Fathers who'd prefer their daughters bang other teenagers are retarded.
Again none of this would be an issue if fathers could just marry them off to men who'd make good husbands and beat them/keep them in the house as punishment for being sluts.
To make you think about what subversives have lead women to believe. The 1850 girl probably has better familiar bonds and a higher level of trust. The 2019 chick will have been subjected to the progressive ideology; making her a hate-filled whore. Personally, I don't trust hate-filled whores.
The point is that the 17 year old of the present is not the 17 year old of the past. They're much less grown up and mature. They're far less prepared for society & the burdens of true responsibility than even 12 year old from 170 years ago. It speaks to the original comment on this thread.
view the rest of the comments →
yewotm8 ago
That's really not a big deal. If you think a 17 year old fucking anybody is bad then you are bluepilled. There is no actual argument for "young fertile women who are fully physically developed should not have sex" other than "I don't like it". Age of consent only exists because feminism has prevented fathers from making decisions about whom their daughters spread for, so they try to use the state to help them out. But even then it's nonsensical, because a young woman is much better off fucking an established older man who is capable of forming a family with her. Fathers who'd prefer their daughters bang other teenagers are retarded.
Again none of this would be an issue if fathers could just marry them off to men who'd make good husbands and beat them/keep them in the house as punishment for being sluts.
Wonder_Boy ago
So....Epstein did nothing wrong?
DANKE_ST_GHIDORAH ago
Epstein probably murders and eats babies dude, so yes, he does very wrong things.
Wonder_Boy ago
Maybe so. But think about this: would you trust a 12 year old girl from 1850 to watch your house for a week, or a 17 year old from 2019?
DANKE_ST_GHIDORAH ago
Why would I think about that?
Derpfroot ago
To make you think about what subversives have lead women to believe. The 1850 girl probably has better familiar bonds and a higher level of trust. The 2019 chick will have been subjected to the progressive ideology; making her a hate-filled whore. Personally, I don't trust hate-filled whores.
Just a little thought experiment.
DANKE_ST_GHIDORAH ago
Yea, I've been to Voat, too.
Derpfroot ago
Well shit, man. You asked.
DANKE_ST_GHIDORAH ago
"Epstein is bad."
"Yea but 160 year old 12 year olds?"
Just a thought experiment. Epstein did do wrong, the "thought experiment" is a detraction.
Wonder_Boy ago
The point is that the 17 year old of the present is not the 17 year old of the past. They're much less grown up and mature. They're far less prepared for society & the burdens of true responsibility than even 12 year old from 170 years ago. It speaks to the original comment on this thread.
DANKE_ST_GHIDORAH ago
Right, which had nothing at all to do with my comment.