Missed representation of what happened. This is despicable to say the least and as you already were questionable to my eyes you keep pushing for a false narrative. The one that gave the power to them from getting her information was no one else than srayzie.
thats how vindictive you are when people refuse to hand their power over to you
bullshit sguevar. Theoldones stepped in to aid Srayzie, and Putt undid his good judgement - because, no doubt - from lobbying from the likes of Kevdude and perhaps you
fuck yurselves
if you dont even give us the tools to mitigate against doxxing and death threats, let alone uphold our Constitutional Right to Peaceable Assembly, shove your rules up your ass. Your opinion of me holds no water
Theoldones stepped in only cause he received naked photos from srayzie. It's called infidelity and a really shitty look to have someone running Q that is a skank.
You were not n the PM chain that I had with Cynabuns and Puttitout. I gave proof that she provided links to her personal social media. And I shared that proof with several others. Including both Srayzie and Crensch.
perhaps you
Your reaction to my comment clearly shows your lack of objectivity because now you try to apply guilty by association and not look at the bigger picture. This is why you are so questionable to my eyes. You keep giving proof of it.
fuck yurselves
Oh wow an emotional outburst that really hurt.... /s
if you dont even give us the tools to mitigate against doxxing and death threats, let alone uphold our Constitutional Right to Peaceable Assembly, shove your rules up your ass. Your opinion of me holds no water
You are demanding tools that go against FREEDOM OF SPEECH in order to ensure a SAFE SPACE for your community and without engaging on dialogue. You are behaving just as the same group you thought fighting against, an entitled social justice warrior. Congratulations not only you corrupted your cause but you behave exactly as you projected.
so your concerns lack substance
as for posts, we curate to keep on topic, ike every other sub
and go ahead, ping @argosciv in, he can tell you how the voat user agreement has nothing explicitly against private subs exercising flexibility at their own discretion
you dont like the Q sub im modding in, go to another , or start your own
go look through the deleted comments folder. find anything deleted by me ?
And yet you are supporting that approach which is in fact as reprehensible as doing it.
so your concerns lack substance
Not really your behavior already shows it is highly possible. But if you are asking me to give you the benefit of the doubt, I can do that.
as for posts, we curate to keep on topic, ike every other sub
I don't have a problem with the posts as my comments have always expressed, unless they have to do with the main topic of the subverse and they respect the rules, obviously. So on that we agree on.
and go ahead, ping @argosciv in, he can tell you how the voat user agreement has nothing explicitly against private subs exercising flexibility at their own discretion
I know and yet the behavior was agreed even before you and I were here as a way to preserve the FREEDOM OF SPEECH of the users. Basically what you are telling me here equates to a immigrant going to another country that already has a set of rules and agreements established and that the immigrant refuses to adapt to because he is an immigrant.
you dont like the Q sub im modding in, go to another , or start your own
I find the topic interesting but yes I don't follow it nor trust it. However my problem is not with your sub, my problem resides with your questionable character pushing false narratives.
Interesting so now you claim I spit poison and I am not impartial. I think you need to read about what it means to be impartial because you were projecting there. At least you accepted your projection afterwards.
Actually I asked personally @kevdude regarding much of the accusations thrown at him in which he also told me that she attempted to it and he refused. I never asked for the proof of those pms because I wanted to see what would happen. With the screenshots he posted on the different interactions he did show the proof of what he previously told me.
Meaning he backed his word and was being honest, so trustworthy in my book. This is a whole new matter now because now they are trying to shift it as a low blow from his part to discredit his accusers.
Basically they are accusing him of the same thing they did against him, projecting much? And don't even notice that what he discredited more was their accusations.
I am quite disappointed on much of the reactions I see from some of the people I held in high regard at this point... But well they already showed that they will resort into using whatever mean possible to achieve their goal... even attacking my persona and accusing me of being an alt.
Yes. I believe Kev about the pics and whatnot. You've been a voice of reason in this. What concerns me is blackmail, or mods being compromised. Ending freedom of speech is disgusting. Did they forget why Voat was created? I hope they start seeing the writing on the wall. I also wonder if Srayzie tried to send things to Putt. My opinion as of right now is that Srayzie is part of some group and used sex to seduce the local men. I think that ending free speech on Voat was her goal. I want to make a post on it all when I get time to do it right.
I also wonder if Srayzie tried to send things to Putt. My opinion as of right now is that Srayzie is part of some group and used sex to seduce the local men. I think that ending free speech on Voat was her goal.
I honestly can't focus on hypotheticals. I need to focus on what I have on the table.
But we do have a name for those girls/women that act in that way to trick men. We call them "calienta pichas", It literally translates to "dick warmers". There is also a saying that my mother put in my head a long time ago: "Cuando la de abajo se para, la de arriba no piensa" which translates to "When the one below/downstairs stands up, the one above/upstairs stops thinking/doesn't think".
If you want to make the post go for it but personally I wouldn't pay much attention to it because there are too many hypotheticals and when I first heard about the pics I was surprised as I didn't think srayzie would engage in such behavior.
Certainly puts in question her motives but I can't address that do to so many unknowns.
view the rest of the comments →
MolochHunter ago
you give pedophile doxxers the power to hound people off this site in fear of their families safety if they betray you, Kev
thats how vindictive you are when people refuse to hand their power over to you
own it
sguevar ago
Missed representation of what happened. This is despicable to say the least and as you already were questionable to my eyes you keep pushing for a false narrative. The one that gave the power to them from getting her information was no one else than srayzie.
Actually that is exactly how you are behaving.
MolochHunter ago
bullshit sguevar. Theoldones stepped in to aid Srayzie, and Putt undid his good judgement - because, no doubt - from lobbying from the likes of Kevdude and perhaps you
fuck yurselves
if you dont even give us the tools to mitigate against doxxing and death threats, let alone uphold our Constitutional Right to Peaceable Assembly, shove your rules up your ass. Your opinion of me holds no water
Gothamgirl ago
Theoldones stepped in only cause he received naked photos from srayzie. It's called infidelity and a really shitty look to have someone running Q that is a skank.
sguevar ago
You were not n the PM chain that I had with Cynabuns and Puttitout. I gave proof that she provided links to her personal social media. And I shared that proof with several others. Including both Srayzie and Crensch.
Your reaction to my comment clearly shows your lack of objectivity because now you try to apply guilty by association and not look at the bigger picture. This is why you are so questionable to my eyes. You keep giving proof of it.
Oh wow an emotional outburst that really hurt.... /s
You are demanding tools that go against FREEDOM OF SPEECH in order to ensure a SAFE SPACE for your community and without engaging on dialogue. You are behaving just as the same group you thought fighting against, an entitled social justice warrior. Congratulations not only you corrupted your cause but you behave exactly as you projected.
So much objectivity there, isn't it @argosciv?
MolochHunter ago
go look through the deleted comments folder
find anything deleted by me ?
just one thing?
can you?
i havent done it yet
so your concerns lack substance as for posts, we curate to keep on topic, ike every other sub
and go ahead, ping @argosciv in, he can tell you how the voat user agreement has nothing explicitly against private subs exercising flexibility at their own discretion
you dont like the Q sub im modding in, go to another , or start your own
period
sguevar ago
And yet you are supporting that approach which is in fact as reprehensible as doing it.
Not really your behavior already shows it is highly possible. But if you are asking me to give you the benefit of the doubt, I can do that.
I don't have a problem with the posts as my comments have always expressed, unless they have to do with the main topic of the subverse and they respect the rules, obviously. So on that we agree on.
I know and yet the behavior was agreed even before you and I were here as a way to preserve the FREEDOM OF SPEECH of the users. Basically what you are telling me here equates to a immigrant going to another country that already has a set of rules and agreements established and that the immigrant refuses to adapt to because he is an immigrant.
I find the topic interesting but yes I don't follow it nor trust it. However my problem is not with your sub, my problem resides with your questionable character pushing false narratives.
mhm... sure.
argosciv ago
The funny part is that you can see he's only doing it to spit poison.
Pretended to be an impartial party at first but really isn't when you read between the lines.
Hell, I'll admit I'm not an impartial party, this shit became personal for me long ago.
sguevar ago
Interesting so now you claim I spit poison and I am not impartial. I think you need to read about what it means to be impartial because you were projecting there. At least you accepted your projection afterwards.
CheeseboogerHimself ago
It appears that Srayzie sent out a lot of tit pics. It was her currency. These fools still won't let up and admit that they were tricked
sguevar ago
Actually I asked personally @kevdude regarding much of the accusations thrown at him in which he also told me that she attempted to it and he refused. I never asked for the proof of those pms because I wanted to see what would happen. With the screenshots he posted on the different interactions he did show the proof of what he previously told me.
Meaning he backed his word and was being honest, so trustworthy in my book. This is a whole new matter now because now they are trying to shift it as a low blow from his part to discredit his accusers.
Basically they are accusing him of the same thing they did against him, projecting much? And don't even notice that what he discredited more was their accusations.
I am quite disappointed on much of the reactions I see from some of the people I held in high regard at this point... But well they already showed that they will resort into using whatever mean possible to achieve their goal... even attacking my persona and accusing me of being an alt.
CheeseboogerHimself ago
Yes. I believe Kev about the pics and whatnot. You've been a voice of reason in this. What concerns me is blackmail, or mods being compromised. Ending freedom of speech is disgusting. Did they forget why Voat was created? I hope they start seeing the writing on the wall. I also wonder if Srayzie tried to send things to Putt. My opinion as of right now is that Srayzie is part of some group and used sex to seduce the local men. I think that ending free speech on Voat was her goal. I want to make a post on it all when I get time to do it right.
CerealBrain ago
lol mate
sguevar ago
I honestly can't focus on hypotheticals. I need to focus on what I have on the table.
But we do have a name for those girls/women that act in that way to trick men. We call them "calienta pichas", It literally translates to "dick warmers". There is also a saying that my mother put in my head a long time ago: "Cuando la de abajo se para, la de arriba no piensa" which translates to "When the one below/downstairs stands up, the one above/upstairs stops thinking/doesn't think".
If you want to make the post go for it but personally I wouldn't pay much attention to it because there are too many hypotheticals and when I first heard about the pics I was surprised as I didn't think srayzie would engage in such behavior.
Certainly puts in question her motives but I can't address that do to so many unknowns.
argosciv ago
You're transparent as fuck, I have no interest in engaging your bullshit.
sguevar ago
I don't know what transparent means for you but at this point you also show lack of objectivity. Well done!