Your concern trolling looks like pedantics. You should just go back to reddit. Sorry.

"Speech" isn't just another word for "good", big guy.

Saying "x is speech" is not the same thing as "x is good".

That being said, this is all a deflection from the fact that you redefined speech to exclude photographs.

But @cyclops1771 was right. It would be too much manhood for you to just admit you fucked up.

This submission was linked from this v/soapdoxbanhammer comment by @HateCumbuckets.

^{Posted automatically (#42817) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

Fucker, chill. I need you here.

@Puttitout hey man, it's me or him. Just ban me for disagreeing with the super awesome builder that exists through ad hominems, personal attacks, and lies.

Ban me, because I quit. Ban me and be the Ellen Pao Destroyer you always wanted to be.

How can I "prove" anything when you are known to edit your own posts when called out?

YOU claimed you only direct linked instead of archiving because it saved time. I proved it was a lie.

So now, you bring in @zyklon_B into the conversation for no reason other than to deflect your own lies. Not once was he or his shitty posts mentioned in this thread. Why bring them up? Desperation?

I then showed that you both direct linked it AND archived it, showing you to be a Liar.

Just admit you are a vote brigader. I'm sick of this shit. Just admit your intentions. You make me sick. You know what you were doing.

@Puttitout, is THIS what a "builder" does? No offense, but this dude is an SRS brigader, and instead of manning up and saying, "defending CP doesn't deserve free speech, that's only for things I like", he decides to attempt a SRS brigade, and then attack me when I call him out.

I am sure I will be banned or whatever for stating the truth, so, my friends please PM for me , because I don't have alts to PM request re-instatement myself.

All, I'm pretty fucking pissed that I have to go this route just because I don't agree with the narrative that I am not allowed to disagree with an "approved" and "badged" asshoole.

I'm just a 90% fuckaround shit poster, here to fuck around with friends. I won't be missed by voat.co overall. I get it, I'm a pissant in the scheme of things. Fine.

Voat is yours, not mine.

Kick me out, fine, keep "builders" liek this guy KevDude, who SRS brigades people.

That's your choice of what voat will be in the future.

I know that you will choose towards your own interest, and so this is most likely my last post on voat.

Thank you @atko, and thank you @puttitout for your time. You rule.

But you have a website to run, not babysit little bitches like me. I love you SDBH fuckers! Nice knowing you all!

@clamhurt_legbeard, @hatecumbuckets, @redcobra, @KVD, @thelma, @native, @not_mattvision

I don't have to dictate it. It's apparent to all.

You brigade opinions and speech you don't like.

Saying "yeah, I fucked up, I was wrong in this specific instance" is way too much manhood for you, isn't it?

Not impressed. At every point, you choose the wrong route.

So far, your options have been, "I'm a good boy, I have never done anything wrong, ever" or, "I am right in most things, but I'm so insecure in my positions that I can't possibly admit a single fuck up"."

Painting yourself into a corner isn't the best solution, imo.

Being a pussy isn't a good look dude.

Just say, yeah, man I probably fucked up, or Fuck you, I'll brigade who i want.

This answer has soyboy all over it.

No, you linked to that specific comment, not the discussion. If you wanted to do that, you would have started at the parent, and let the reader figure it out.

Sorry if I'm busting your balls or if it seems that way. I just detest SRS and their shitty tactics, and that's what your post seemed like. I may be in error, but I personally don't think so. If you weren't trying to, at least I informed you that it was kind of how it looked - up to you what you want to do with that information.

IF (porn)(photo) = FALSE; AND 1photo = TRUE; AND 1sculpture = TRUE; THEN (porn)(sculpture) = FALSE;

And yet you draw some arbitrary line in the sand when it comes to pornophotography. Actually, that line extended further to paedopornophotography when I pointed this out the first time. You're arguing in circles at this point.

You posted both, though, so that's a complete lie.

You want to try again with an honest answer, or just want to stick with "Yeah, I was trying to drum up a downvote brigade on opinions I don't agree with like an SRS faggot?"

You're all up in my comments today, eh?

We just happen to be on the same threads.

You're all up in my comments today, eh?

More of that maturity showing through.

You're all up in my comments today, eh?

You may have missed my edit/clarification - if you aren't trying to SRS-style brigade, then why the direct link rather than just the archive?

And if someone has a shitty opinion, why are you broadcasting out that opinion as shitty and unpopular if not to suppress it?

Well at least you bite the bullet in the end. I'll give you that.

Let's have a warm round of applause for Kev "photographs are not art" Dude.

Is this not speech? I'm not even going to trap you; I'm going to just tell you: you're looking at a representation of an historical event, the Rape of the Sabines.

Now, first you said it wasn't speech because it was a photograph. Then you moved the goalposts that it wasn't speech because it was a pornographic photo. So clearly the "porn" part is the problem, is it not? So this sculpture of a Roman cucking a Sabine man and raping his woman "isn't" speech, right?

You may squirm now.

SRS-tier shit, though?

Are you farming for votes or downvotes or trying to start a brigade?

What is the point of this link?

This submission was linked from this v/Assholesanonymous comment.

^{Posted automatically (#42583) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}