I wouldnt say Putt is going to jail because he isnt in America. Im saying the internet loopholes you exploit are being fixed legally. I wish i could take credit for it.
Perhaps he can, but I don't. What do you mean by "internet loopholes" and what activity is currently being done on Voat which you assert is being made illegal (and so presumably is not currently illegal)? Also, you seem to indicate a change of law at the State level but refer to an investigation at the Federal level (which suggests there are already laws in place giving the basis for investigation). Can you reconcile those things, please?
What do you mean by "internet loopholes" and what activity is currently being done on Voat which you assert is being made illegal (and so presumably is not currently illegal)?
Creating and abusing algorithms to manufacture public consent while also silencing others. Voat's particular case is awkward because from all the updates done over the years create the facade that Voat isn't gamed, and any particular topic that SBBH/SRS isnt ahead of already is kept from reaching eyeballs.
Also, you seem to indicate a change of law at the State level but refer to an investigation at the Federal level (which suggests there are already laws in place giving the basis for investigation). Can you reconcile those things, please?
Both are happening at the same time. My state took the initiative at the same time the white house is making the same moves.
view the rest of the comments →
freshmeat ago
I wouldnt say Putt is going to jail because he isnt in America. Im saying the internet loopholes you exploit are being fixed legally. I wish i could take credit for it.
Whats got you so nervous
ExpertShitposter ago
name the loopholes
freshmeat ago
i bet you can figure it out on your own. Kevdude sees the writing on the wall, watching him lately has been hilarious.
Thisismyvoatusername ago
Perhaps he can, but I don't. What do you mean by "internet loopholes" and what activity is currently being done on Voat which you assert is being made illegal (and so presumably is not currently illegal)? Also, you seem to indicate a change of law at the State level but refer to an investigation at the Federal level (which suggests there are already laws in place giving the basis for investigation). Can you reconcile those things, please?
freshmeat ago
Creating and abusing algorithms to manufacture public consent while also silencing others. Voat's particular case is awkward because from all the updates done over the years create the facade that Voat isn't gamed, and any particular topic that SBBH/SRS isnt ahead of already is kept from reaching eyeballs.
Both are happening at the same time. My state took the initiative at the same time the white house is making the same moves.
Shizy ago
So wouldn't the "Feds" be more interested in Facebook and twatter?
freshmeat ago
They are. In fact i believe those companies are named specifically in the legislation