You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

FecalDemiurge6000 ago

The DMCA request was for "voat.com", not "voat.co". It can be safely ignored.

turtlesarepureevil ago

you fucking retard. learn how to read.

@hangry way to go accepting shit at face value numbskull.

ruck_feddit ago

Except the sticky has a picture that does say voat.com

turtlesarepureevil ago

makes absolutely no difference.

Fibbideh ago

Not to you, but to a lawyer, it does.

turtlesarepureevil ago

The trademark was infringed. No one is arguing against that.

Attempting to put on a band aid after a throat has been slit is akin to hope for you.

Fibbideh ago

And putt doesn't have to do anything until they send the request to the correct website.

On top of this, as ChiComs pointed out here. The trademark was NOT infringed. It is a limited use trademark which only applies to the following.

  1. Beverageware, namely, insulated coffee and beverage cups, mugs; thermal insulated container for food and beverages

  2. Coffee; ground and whole bean coffee; expresso beverages; coffee beans; ground coffee beans

  3. Coffee roasting and processing

  4. Online retail store services featuring coffees and beverageware; wholesale distributorships and wholesale ordering services all in the field of coffee; on-line ordering services and on-line retail store services all in the field of coffee and beverageware

A username on Voat is none of these.