Tallest, I no longer consider you a shill and am in fact beginning to see that you may be of the most valuable players here. As such, i'd appreciate if you could give me (us) your opinions on a few things:
1) The demographic trend line we are on spells white genocide in the US. Do you believe the best course is to begin planning for a white ethnostate and to consider the US as we know it a lost cause? Or do you believe it's possible/probable to somehow change the demographics to our favor and save the country?
2) Are there any leaders or institutions that have earned your trust in or outside of government?
3) Is Richard Spencer worth anything? I know he might be sort of old news, or perhaps he's been proved a shill even, I don't know, I'm asking what you think because he just called for an ethnostate on a Swiss island apparently, and I'm curious what thoughts you have on that.
Thank.
view the rest of the comments →
kneo24 ago
I believe it's one L, not two, in "skil". So @tallest_skil, for future reference.
On that note, tallest_skil is a fucking kike and he breaks down when you use his narratives against him. Just endlessly scream "Moishe" at him like he does everyone else, and twist his words as an admittance to nothing he admitted to (or even did admit to) to prove what a Jew he is - which again is another one of his tactics.
Don't fall for such easy and simple bait and view them as a legitimate person.
Tallest_Skil ago
This is honestly the best shilling money can buy, folks.
Fine, twist objective truth. See how far that gets you.
kneo24 ago
Here's one out of your playbook:
THANKS FOR ADMITTING YOU'RE A SHAPESHIFTING JEW, MOISHE.
Here's another one from your playbook.
THANKS FOR ADMITTING YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT
Tallest_Skil ago
Yeah, so… where’s your actual argument? Why can’t you substantiate any of your initial claims?
kneo24 ago
You mean this whole shitshow where I attempted to engage you, and your first response was, "hur durr you dumb" and then twist my words? It's not the first time you've done it to me, much less anyone else here on Voat.
Tallest_Skil ago
Your words were twisted before I ever got my hands on them. Serious question: what don’t you understand about my reply? It’s fairly straightforward. My problem with Voat is twofold:
You act like it’s some evil thing that I’m calling for censorship. You tried to use it as a ‘gotcha’, when in reality–since you didn’t read my posts–all you’re doing is advocating for the right to lie. Specifically, you’re demanding that Voat become EXACTLY LIKE EVERY SINGLE OTHER KIKE-OWNED WEBSITE ON THE ENTIRE FUCKING INTERNET. Explain to me why you should be allowed to post lies here. Explain to me why the truth is not allowed to have ONE website where nothing except it can be posted. And explain to me how you are so mentally disturbed that you cannot understand the concept of truth as being objective and external from an individual’s experiences.
kneo24 ago
Again, you start off with a lie. You can't help yourself.
I understand it, I wanted to know how you could ever hope to make such a system work. When I asked, all you did was engage in your bullshit. I even initially pointed out that the interpretation of truth was going to be an issue you'd have to deal with your system and what did I get? Derision from you while you more or less admitting it was an issue.
And how has censorship ever worked for the benefit of the people?
Here again is another lie from you. If you were so intent on a website where you can only tell the truth, why is that you don't live up to what you want? I read your posts, but you constantly have your head stuck too far up your ass to ever see differently. It has to be your way or else the person has to be something you abhor. And then you pretend to wonder why people are so combative with you.
You mean censorship? The very thing you're advocating for?
If you want to run a website full of censorship then you be the person to make it happen. You're asking for this platform to completely change to suit your whims and you've refused to explain how it could possibly work without the infallibility of humans at the helm.
Everything you write is entirely suspect and shows that you speak out both sides of your mouth.
Tallest_Skil ago
Do you know what truth is?
Not if you know what it is.
TO. KEEP. OUT. JEWS. AND. COMMUNISTS.
What the hell are you even talking about?
You make the mistake of thinking I’m anything like you. I rarely post opinion at all. You live in a fantasy world in which truth doesn’t exist, so if someone comes along and says something, you instantly ascribe whatever it is to ‘opinion’, without evidence. You then get terminally ass-blasted when your own opinions on the subject are PROVEN wrong.
Of truth.
The exact opposite, yeah.
“Oy vey goyim what’s wrong why can’t you afford multi-billion dollar infrastructure why can’t you get the permits why can’t you get the licenses ha ha too bad guess you don’t get to have your own platform”
Again, you literally cannot comprehend any existence other than “everything is feelings and opinions”, so you just project your own fallacies onto others.
No…
[citation needed]
You tend not to sound like a stroke victim when you do that, yeah.
Here’s a question for you: how about you just refute my statements as they come up, okay skippy? Why can’t you refute a single goddamn thing that I say?
kneo24 ago
I do know what truth is. This doesn't answer my question. How do you intend to make such a system work? You keep dodging it like a (((shifty person))). Answer the question, kike.
That's a bit irrelevant if you what it is. The person you're engaging with may not know the truth. They may know half of it, none of it, 90% of it. If your idea is to take Voat, and turn it into a platform of censorship for "the truth" (which is pretty much what leftists have done with (((facebook))) and twitter), what you're now doing is limiting discussion.
"I'm sorry, your post have been removed for not being truthful." So how does that system work? Who or what is making the determination of what the truth is? This is a core part of you describing how the system works, but again, it's something you've refused to do.
I asked how has it ever benefited, not how you intend to make it benefit. This was a good chance for you to show an example from history where it worked really well, something that enriched the populace's lives and worked long term.
If you want nothing but the truth being told, you yourself should always tell the truth. It's clear you don't.
I never said or implied your hooked nosed attitude was anything like mine.
Here is another lie from you.
And how does your system prevent that? Give us a run down of the inner workings. Repeatedly stating, "by censoring lies" is low grade pre-school argumentation.
I don't believe you.
You have refused to explain the inner workings of a system and expect everyone to jump on board with it. Your only other option is to show us how such a system can work for us to see the merits in it. Now you're refusing to do both. You literally have no argument. (By the way, it doesn't take multi-million dollar infrastructure to keep Voat running. It seems like you've added another element, funding, that is necessary to your explanation of keeping your censorship utopia afloat.)
Except I've never stated or implied any such thing. Your argument doesn't even address anything I've written and is entirely a strawman argument.
Yes... I've outlined it multiple times now.
See any of my responses to you, ever.
It's cute how you think that's clever so you can avoid the obviousness of the metaphor.
This is not how this works. You still have refused to answer the initial question satisfactorily. What you're doing is deflecting away from you actually engaging someone honestly.
Tallest_Skil ago
Your question would be answered if you knew what truth was.
It was literally already answered.
How is truth discovered?
Why do you want discussion about and between lies to be engaged in? How does that help anyone, least of all the white race?
Sounds pretty accurate, yeah.
Thanks, again, for admitting that you have no idea what truth is.
And you got an answer. The answer hurt your feelings, so you rejected it. Just like a leftist does. Because 1. You don’t know what truth is and 2. You think it has to do with your feelings.
The US Constitution at its founding.
Certainly endeavor to.
So… post truth when I don’t.
You absolutely implied. You’re projecting your own worldview onto others because you cannot comprehend any state of being other than “truth is not objective.” You therefore assume that everyone behaves in this way. It is an irreconcilable difference, and since you are objectively wrong, you and your kind will have to be physically removed from society if it is to survive.
Nice refutation. I’m certainly inclined to believe you now that you’ve not refuted a word I said.
You keep asking a question that, again, you would not be asking if you knew what truth is.
Do you know what a lie is?
Well, then, who would you believe?
This is a trick question. I am informing you of this because it doesn’t matter–you’ll still answer incorrectly.
lol
Will it keep hurting you if I repeat “You are rejecting answers that hurt your feelings because they go against your worldview”?
I would certainly hope not, but you’re clearly deflecting from point you yourself are trying to make here.
Whatever you want to lie to yourself about, I guess.
If you want to act like a 5 year old, reddit is that way.
So you have no citation, got it. Thanks for admitting you were proven wrong.
I’m simply mocking you because, again, you’ve refused to provide a citation for anything you’ve said, as well as to refute anything I’ve said.
Thanks for admitting you can’t prove your own claims.
TRANSLATION: “THE ANSWER YOU GAVE ME HURT MY FEELINGS, SO IT’S NOT AN ANSWER BECAUSE I SAY SO”
Thanks for LITERALLY FUCKING ADMITTING that everything I said about you and your projectionism is true.
Where. Is. Your. Proof. Of. Anything. You. Have. Said.
Honestly, you should fellate a shotgun. I’m dead tired of you fucking faggots who do NOTHING but ignore the topic of a discussion and try to attack the presenter. Legitimately kill yourself. You’re an embarrassment to the rest of the paid shills.
kneo24 ago
Instead of engaging in pointless ad-homs and wall of text quotes, you yet again admit you have nothing to offer to this conversation. You have been given ample opportunity to explain your idea and you refuse to do so under the guise of one not knowing something. If you were truly interested in educating others and dialog, in preaching the truth, you wouldn't dodge the question or issue. You insist on doing so while projecting your own failings upon others. Your whole goal is to waste time and when your standard tactics don't work, you insist on using a stalling tactic like you're doing now. You have proven without a shadow of a doubt you offer absolutely nothing to anyone and are fearful of actual conversation, actual discourse and debate by your tactics alone. Had you a shred of integrity and decency left in you, you wouldn't act the way you do. Not a single time dare to do anything else but twist words, build up strawmen, and claim your opponent is projecting when you're the one entirely doing so.
To throw your words back in your face, kike rat:
Tallest_Skil ago
Reported. We’re done here.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/news comment by @kneo24.
Posted automatically (#10352) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
kneo24 ago
You just admitted you report to your Jew masters of who you can't control.
Tallest_Skil ago
Reported. We’re done here.
kneo24 ago
Thanks for admitting you have no argument and report your failings to your kike masters, Moishe.
Tallest_Skil ago
Reported. We’re done here. ˚
kneo24 ago
Thanks for admitting you have no argument and report your failings to your kike masters, Moishe.
Tallest_Skil ago
lol, keep crying
kneo24 ago
Say's the Jew who reports everyone to his Jew masters when he has absolutely nothing left.