So you're saying it's not a warning worth taking into consideration and should be ignored ?

Yeah you're right, understanding that shit skins have done it to white Europeans in the past is way to hard for most stupid faggots.

Making us look bad... sry, don't give a shit about your perception complex.

How about you just come to realize that it's true and has been used against whites before... you know, by shit skins.

Self regulate, go fuck yourself you faggot. Too stupid to understand a PSA warning ffs.

People have been shopping celebs faces into porn for years. The only difference now is that it's possible with video too and suddenly everyone is acting like it's the end of the world.

Conventional (western) women today repulse men regardless of their porn exposure.

It's partly feminism fault.

Same logic with men who will eventually prefer "female" robots who will cook and clean over feminists.

Any deviation from traditional culture would eventually lead to society's demise.

IKR ?

As if it's that hard to see that even shit skins know that promiscuity destroys nations.

some things mohammad adapted from surrounding peoples that made sense:

• OPs thing

• throw fags off rooftops

• cut thieves hands off(this being a first offense for sandus makes sense, but add a three strike rule to make it suitable for white use)

Seeing as you're located on the bottom left of the IQ bell curve, I'll have you know that a quote which speaks truth is valid no matter who said it.

Come out of your echo chamber.

Accept a jack boot on your throat.

It worked though.

White cultural degeneration eventually led to the Muslim invasion of Europe.

The average sand nigger is more sane than the average white libtards.

That was one of the Roman things too. Media portrays it otherwise like the romans were naked with their tits hanging out and guys with their dicks flopping everywhere in short togas.

If you read Plutarchs parallel lives he goes over the whole founding of rome. Basically the romans were a bunch of men. Escaped slaves and criminals who built a city. They had no women so they went ooga booga and stole the women from the Sabine people. There were still standards though. Unmarried daughters without children.

The tradition of carrying the bride across the threshold comes from the "rape" of the sabine women.

The Sabines took too long building an army to come back and retake their daughters.

So the romans and sabines are fighting and basically the kidnapped daughters come out and stop the fighting. They tell their fathers that, while they were taken unwillingly, theyve gotten married and have children now. They took too long to come rescue them. Are they going to kill their son in laws and the fathers of their grandchildren? Then they tell the Romans that in order for this to work peacefully standards had to be put in place to treat the women with respect as their wives so this new city can become civilized.

A lot of the things feminists bitch as "patriarchy" about come from the rules of the Sabine women.

One though was for the people to dress modestly. So much so that a man exposing himself to the women in public would be tried by the same judges as freaking murder

If you read ancient historians one of the standards the romans used for telling how civilized a foreign tribe was was whether they mated in the open or not.

Then don't take the advice, but realize others have.

Even a broken clock, yo.

I think voat likes decency.

Does that make the statement any less true ?

The vultures pick out any scraps they like