It occurred to me that you might have dismissed the meme as untrue from the source domain not being there.

I used this kike's numbers with the wikipedia numbers to show absurdity.

If the area needed for a person that kike mentioned was correct, and it really seems not far off, this estimation, using the official Jew-sanctioned research cunt's numbers, is beyond ridiculous in favor of the (((narrative))); the numbers are still nowhere near adding up.

Sadly, it was probably shoahed long ago.

Seems like this man has put up some solid math to back up his meme. Only a retard would take a meme as 100% gospel. They are generally assumed to convey a general concept. In this case, that there is not enough room on the land to support the claim.

Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and point out the flaw in his math? He has provided plenty of solid math below, show us the error please.

You know what? LET'S DO SOME MORE MATH, KIKE.

With YOUR numbers, 1,568,996 sq ft are needed.

THE ENTIRE TREBLINKA CAMP IS 1,437,480 sq ft source (((wikipedia))) just for you, kike.

The BURIAL PITS are marked in yellow. I shouldn't even have to continue with the math at this point, you fucking clown.

God DAMN I thought kikes were supposed to be smart.

Fuck it. LET'S KEEP GOING WITH MATH, JEW.

Let's use the only dimensions they give for a ditch, which probably means it's the biggest there - 13,120 sq ft

7 yellow marks - 91,840 sq ft

Depth? 33 feet. At a GENEROUS 5ft per person, and rounding up to fucking 35 ft, JUST FOR YOU, CHAIM, that's 642,880

642,880 sq ft for 1,568,996 sq ft needed.

With Every. Single. Estimate. Being. Generous. To. Your. Narrative. You'd still need more than twice as much space.

But let's also not forget that the study done in 2010 with the Jews' permission only mention "one in particular" with a square footage of only 4,930. The wiki's numbers are 2.66 times higher than the apologist numbers.

However, a study begun in 2010 by forensic archeologist, Caroline Sturdy Colls, was conducted with permission and in a scientific manner. Using the same GPR device Krege allegedly used, Colls has preliminarily identified “a number of buried pits” that are “considerable in size, and very deep, one in particular is 26 by 17 meters [85 by 58 feet].” Colls noted that: “Another five pits of varying sizes and also at least this deep” are located near the large pit. “Given their size and location, there is a strong case for arguing that they represent burial areas.” Colls indicated that the work was just beginning.[11] As of this date (2014) Colls has not published a formal study on her work at Treblinka.

http://archive.is/zYBSz#selection-1271.0-1315.89

MFW

@OhBlindOne @PeaceSeeker

You both have points. The size of the stadium does not translate to the size of a mass of bodies, but it is still like one Colosseum's worth of area (adding the field area as sitting takes less room than laying flat) stacked 10 high with bodies.

That's a lot of fucking bodies... That's a large hill of bodies. How would you be able to hide something like that?

Hello, Jew.

MY math is just fine. The image above more or less illustrates the complete and utter inanity of the claim, but by all means,

13,074,969,600 sq ft of LA

7.5 billion people

1.74 sq ft per person

1,568,996 sq ft needed to reach the Treblinka claim of 900,000

In my math link, the holes claimed to have existed from the "scientific study" were a grand total of 29,580 sq ft using the dimensions of the most notable one (read: biggest)

1,568,996 divided by 29,580 = ~53. FIFTY THREE TIMES MORE ROOM IS NEEDED THAN THEY FOUND. That's JUST using your numbers, and the numbers of fucking kikes like you that publish bullshit like this

@OhBlindOne @PeaceSeeker

Your first link is quite good. I didn't plan on it (was expecting some half ass conspiracy shit) but I watched the whole thing, it is well made and makes way too much sense. For someone like me who has only heard the official version and never gave it much thought, it's kind of eye opening at just how little sense the official narrative actually makes and how many contradictions there are. The intact camps were obvious labor camps with all structures still standing, and while the debate is about those that were destroyed there is literally zero evidence to support the genocide theory and nothing even close to mass graves has ever been found.

It's pretty silly to argue about whether it was possible in theory when there isn't even anything that suggests such events ever took place except hear say. I believe that survivors who perpetuate these stories really believe in them and were genuinely afraid, yet they admit that they never saw any of the things they believe in. It's clearly fucked up to send people to concentration camps and use them for forced labor, but it's altogether something else to do what they show in the movies, with Nazi evil incarnates randomly hand picking who dies, for no apparent reason.

Could you explain this or this?

Just want to get your opinion on the matter.

Edit: Misunderstood.