A moderator of /v/Pizzagate accused me of being a David Brock shill, yesterday. I feel like I have been able to provide plenty of evidence to the contrary. AMA. (thewebofslime)

submitted ago by thewebofslime

But I can provide more.

Do you care to address the false accusation @Vindicator? Maybe explain your line of reasoning? If not, I would be willing to accept an apology for the insults and the false accusation.

I'm happy to have a conversation about it that would seek to alleviate anyone's concerns.

I operate completely transparent where my research is totally public and I post all rough drafts in many places so that everyone can see the logical evolution of my conclusions.

In fact, I even offered up a suggestion on how a small group of people could completely decimate David Brock's operation while driving up shill costs here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3106114

This is far from the first time I have published such ideas and materials, but they never get traction because I do not employ artificial impressions.

I have also been a staunch critic of David Brock since long before Pizzagate. Again, my posting history, going years back, speaks for itself.

I am the best example of an "anti-shill" that I am aware of. I would, of course, be curious in other examples, because I would like to learn more.

The best way to catch liars is to set honesty traps. The funny thing about honesty traps is that honest people don't fall for them. What say you @Vindicator, do you stand by your accusation?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

My next step is to confirm any location data I can find from people who came to my site. That merely means running all of your usernames through my database which is huge.

So, let me get this straight...

You posted this thread on v/pizzagate and v/GreatAwakening, containing 46 links to your own sites...basically as a honeypot so you can collect data on anyone from Voat who visited it?

And then you stirred up a bunch of fake drama to drive more traffic to your site, and justify your actions tracking and attempting to dox me and others?

This sounds like an attempt to scare people investigating pizzagate, not help the investigation.

thewebofslime ago

I never linked to my site in the original chan threads.

Nobody goes to my site. It's not a high value target and it just has news articles in the database.

I only link to it in Voat.

Vindicator ago

I never linked to my site in the original chan threads.

You linked to content posted by you on the chans...and on Reddit...and on Voat...and on Steemit...and on your site. I pointed out that Voat does not look kindly upon people who use Voat primarily to drive traffic to their own material elsewhere. You can read all about it at v/ReportSpammers.

You have a MUCH larger proportion of links to sites you control than anyone I've ever seen post to v/pizzagate. So, in addition to the unsourced claims in your thread, the fake news sources, the inability to access primary sources for most of the content in the thread, and your unwillingness to create a post per the submission rules, I pointed out that you were over the line with Voat's sitewide anti-Spam rule.

Instead of realizing you're giving an entire community the middle finger and apologizing (the appropriate response), you decided to attack me, claimed I was a "shill covering for a criminal conspiracy" and that I was some cyber criminal hacking your site that no one supposedly goes to. You literally dug yourself a hole, filled it with broken glass, jumped in it and then started screaming you were being attacked.