slashster ago

Trust the plan.

BotByAnotherName ago

Q said the elections were secure. Was that disinfo?

ArtistiqueJewelry ago

Not disinfo. The way it all played out, the democrats thought they would get by with their same tactics.

They were given a sense of false security after they thought their threats and lawsuits had scared away any justice when Trump set up the Commission into Election Integrity.

They should know how Trump deals with being bullied by now!

SWINE_PORKUS ago

Which parts of what you listed are disinformation? Q said disinformation is necessary, so which parts of what you provided fall under that category?

ArtistiqueJewelry ago

If you're asking that, You're Not reading the drops!

SWINE_PORKUS ago

Don’t dodge the question, answer it.

ArtistiqueJewelry ago

I've Clearly done my Homework!

Stop dodging your homework and attempting to make everyone Else responsible for your info.

Take Responsibility! That is the goal!

For Example,

Do you understand what is being said here?

Qdrop

If I tell the disinfo, it's no longer disinfo for those it is inteded to be disinfo for, right?

If you are on it, you pick it up.

Qdrop2

Now look at what came First in that post.

Qanon3

“Mr. Huber is conducting his work from outside the Washington D.C. area and in cooperation with the Inspector General,” Sessions said, noting that Huber’s review would “include a full, complete, and objective evaluation of these matters in a manner that is consistent with the law and facts.”

The attorney general cited U.S. Code, noting that the appointment of a special counsel was "reserved for use in only the most 'extraordinary circumstances,'" and that any special counsel must be "selected from outside the United States Government."

On March 6, Gowdy, R-S.C., and Goodlatte, R-Va., penned a joint letter to Sessions demanding the appointment of a special counsel to investigate "conflicts of interest" and decisions "made and not made" by current and former Justice Department officials in 2016 and 2017, noting that "the public interest requires" the action.

“The Office of Inspector General will initiate a review that will examine the Justice Department’s and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s compliance with legal requirements, and with applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) relating to a certain U.S. person,” the Horowitz statement obtained by Fox News read. “As part of this examination, the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source.”

directing senior federal prosecutors to evaluate “certain issues” requested by congressional Republicans, involving the sale of Uranium One and alleged unlawful dealings related to the Clinton Foundation.

From https://www.justice.gov/usao-ut/meet-us-attorney

Mr. Huber is recognized for his expertise on various subject matters. He has provided training numerous times on a range of topics including domestic violence, national security, and violent crime.

Why was Huber appointed?

According to the Washington Times back in April of this year (2018),

John W. Huber, the U.S. attorney in Utah, can convene a grand jury, issue subpoenas, collect evidence and order witnesses to testify — all the usual powers a federal prosecutor has — as he delves into whether the FBI abused its powers when it sought permission and then carried out wiretapping of a Trump campaign figure, or whether it trod too lightly in pursuing questions about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Mr. Sessions said the facts of the FBI situation don’t yet rise to the level of demanding a special counsel, but Mr. Huber is as close as can be.

“He will have the full authority of a federal prosecutor,” said Richard Painter, former chief ethics attorney for President George W. Bush. “If he looks at this and finds someone in the DOJ lied to a government official, he would be able to convene a grand jury, compel testimony and even prosecute them.”

By appointing an active federal prosecutor — in this case one first nominated by President Obama and kept on by President Trump — Mr. Sessions also may deflect criticism that the review is a partisan attempt to undermine the other special counsel, Robert Mueller, who is investigating the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russia in 2016.

“When you have a special counsel, you always have to wonder if there is overzealousness in their prosecution because they only have one case,” he said. “Huber is going to be less inclined to move forward with prosecution unless it’s warranted because if he moves one case forward, others will be left behind.”

Questions remain about how Mr. Huber will operate. The Justice Department declined to comment on whether he will have a budget or appoint a team like Mr. Mueller. It also would not discuss how Mr. Huber’s probe would work with other active investigations, including Mr. Mueller’s.

“If he starts digging into the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] warrant, for example, he may find something really ugly,” Mr. Painter said. “But some of that may need to be handed over to Mueller.”

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has launched an investigation similar to Mr. Huber‘s. It is not clear, however, if Mr. Horowitz’s reach can compel testimony from key players who are no longer in the federal government, such as former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

Mr. Sessions fired Mr. McCabe last month on charges of misleading investigators looking into whether the bureau slow-walked its investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s exclusive use of a private email server as secretary of state.

Mr. Huber is said to have the power to force testimony from people who have exited the government.

I am not saying all of this Is disinfo, BTW. You can figure it out ; ) . Have fun! Then come back and tell me what you find.