I totally understand why these rules are on place but I find the rule number 5 to be off-putting from the very same reasons which /u/duoi pointed out.
I moderate NSFW subverses myself and there was one which I requested when I joined. I made a mistake back then though since I didn't have enough CCP. The request was denied. I did another one when I had over 100, but request was ignored for a week at least, then denied when the new rule came to place that account must be 30 days old. Now, I'd like to get that subverse really going and was looking forward getting into 30 days but it seems now I'd have to start to create activity into abandoned subverse which would be image post based in any case. It would surely look like I'd only be doing it for the very reason to get qualified especially as I read about this now and I really have no interest for the very same reasons as duoi pointed out.
So is this absolutely necessary rule written to stone and I should just forget it? Sorry if I sound a bit frustrated with this, you guys are doing wonderful job and by no means I mean to criticize, like said I totally understand there must be rules so it's not going to be a wild west. Just been looking forward to it. I loved to do this on that other place and have been already doing it over here in other subverses.
None of these rules are set in stone; (5) and (6) are the most susceptible to changing.
Contribute content for a few days to the subverse; I see that you've contributed a plethora of content to the other subverses that you moderate, and we'd likely approve your request after a few days of activity given your history.
In the case of squatting: If the Moderator is commenting on content you submit, then they must also have submitted content within the last thirty days in order to be considered active. If they are performing both of these functions, then it's likely to not be considered squatting. In the case of /v/Bondage, the Moderator has been inactive for 1 year, 1 month, 11 days — it's unlikely that they'd return so quickly.
view the rest of the comments →
JustWonderful ago
I totally understand why these rules are on place but I find the rule number 5 to be off-putting from the very same reasons which /u/duoi pointed out.
I moderate NSFW subverses myself and there was one which I requested when I joined. I made a mistake back then though since I didn't have enough CCP. The request was denied. I did another one when I had over 100, but request was ignored for a week at least, then denied when the new rule came to place that account must be 30 days old. Now, I'd like to get that subverse really going and was looking forward getting into 30 days but it seems now I'd have to start to create activity into abandoned subverse which would be image post based in any case. It would surely look like I'd only be doing it for the very reason to get qualified especially as I read about this now and I really have no interest for the very same reasons as duoi pointed out.
So is this absolutely necessary rule written to stone and I should just forget it? Sorry if I sound a bit frustrated with this, you guys are doing wonderful job and by no means I mean to criticize, like said I totally understand there must be rules so it's not going to be a wild west. Just been looking forward to it. I loved to do this on that other place and have been already doing it over here in other subverses.
moe ago
None of these rules are set in stone; (
5) and (6) are the most susceptible to changing.Contribute content for a few days to the subverse; I see that you've contributed a plethora of content to the other subverses that you moderate, and we'd likely approve your request after a few days of activity given your history.
In the case of squatting: If the Moderator is commenting on content you submit, then they must also have submitted content within the last thirty days in order to be considered active. If they are performing both of these functions, then it's likely to not be considered squatting. In the case of /v/Bondage, the Moderator has been inactive for 1 year, 1 month, 11 days — it's unlikely that they'd return so quickly.
JustWonderful ago
Alright. Many thanks for clearing that out and I'll do as you advised.