You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SpottyMatt ago

N=20, at least you lead with that .

Otherwise promising, though.

P.S. I thought this was /v/science, not /v/timecube

oar ago

Over 70 papers all say the same as the THREE papers I listed links to and furnished papers to, and I like how you omit my mentioning this weeks N = 100 paper in my OP link, Mr FBI shill. I bet you are part of the 72 downvotes so far by the FBI.

For an early seminal paper with 90% efficacy charts refer to 2005 famous : DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69

https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69

Yes 2005.

If my OP post is so shocking to you, I can tell you have not been up to speed on Virology , if that paper "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread" from 2005 (yes 2005) is not well known to you.

Acting like this 15 year old established drug is shockingly suspect to you is near comical to me.

2005!!!

oar ago

Over 70 papers all say the same as the THREE papers I listed links to and furnished papers to, and I like how you omit my mentioning this weeks N = 100 paper in my OP link, Mr FBI shill. I bet you are part of the 72 downvotes so far by the FBI.

For an early seminal paper with 90% efficacy charts refer to 2005 famous : DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69

https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69

Yes 2005.

If my OP post is so shocking to you, I can tell you have not been up to speed on Virology , if that paper "Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread" from 2005 (yes 2005) is not well known to you.

Acting like this 15 year old established drug is shockingly suspect to you and your so-called doctor wife is near comical to me.

2005!!!