https://archive.fo/1ITzQ
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2367137
Firstly let me state this is an ongoing issue I have had with Voat since my arrival here over 2 years ago and I've lost accounts for calling out the pedophiles and their enablers (/u/ Kevdude and /u/ Crensch and every user at /v/SoapBoxBanHammer protect the pedos, defending their posts under the argument of freedom of expression since it isn't showing full nudity, completely ignoring the fact it is still sexualizing underage persons)
Many others have noticed this in the past and gets attacked, harassed, and slandered for pointing it out.
The admins claim they don't want to take a moral stand and only want to deal with legality regarding banning. This makes you wonder who is he worried about upsetting by getting rid of the pedo subverses?
maybe this has something to do with it
Notice how "popular" voaters are actually encouraging the pedophilia in the top comment.
lulz guise iz jus trollin
By leaving pedophilia on Voat the admins are choosing a side and not simply remaining a neutral authority. This is of concern because pedophiles are in a hardcore campaign right now to make pedophilia a libertarian issue so they can have a clueless support base when laws are inevitably changed to apply to the internet. They know they are able to operate out in the open under temporary loopholes in old laws and want to get as many people on their side before it changes. LGBT community already supports them (and many in LGBT are pedophiles themselves) and now they are getting Libertarian goats to defend their depravity and it's working. I believe there are a lot more closeted homosexuals on this site than people admit, so many people see the pedophilia issue and jump to defend it, seemingly behaving as a Libertarian or even right-wing.
The argument is immediately diverted into a freedom issue instead of ignoring the obvious: It's sexualizing children.
view the rest of the comments →