I'm not seeing any childporn in the deleted submissions. Young looking sure, but all legal if you tinyeye them (and they're even from pay sites). Someone's pulling a prank here.
Yeah, the girls in the pics are all thin and young (18), so whoever did it is probably banking on people just looking at the thumbnail and being too scared/paranoid to click. Pretty low-energy, imho.
view the rest of the comments →
MasterShitposter ago
I'm not seeing any childporn in the deleted submissions. Young looking sure, but all legal if you tinyeye them (and they're even from pay sites). Someone's pulling a prank here.
TheTrigger ago
Yeah, the girls in the pics are all thin and young (18), so whoever did it is probably banking on people just looking at the thumbnail and being too scared/paranoid to click. Pretty low-energy, imho.
go1dfish ago
This is the problem with making the transmission and possession of child porn a strict liability offense.
If there are actual children being abused here I wouldn’t know because I’m too afraid of my government to investigate.
Evidence of a crime being a crime itself causes all sorts of problems.
Is there any other crime a hacker can force you to commit?
Sorry to rant, but this seems like a good teaching moment.
MasterShitposter ago
Maybe OP is looking for attention?
Rotteuxx ago
Maybe ?
Their shit sub is tanking faster than @Sanegoatiswear's narrative from last year at the same time.
@Freshmeat is desperate for attention
anti_pedo ago
OP is one of the know pedos we're tracking. They even pinged their pedo frend go1dfish
go1dfish ago
And what sort of evidence do you have for such a libelous claim?