I have always had CSS disabled. Sub-CSS is just like the cancer that was myspace. Why the fuck do you allow it to be enabled.
They are probably paid to do it for ad agencies or are using it to inflate their 'visitor' rate for their own websites to sell ad's on.
Maybe they are trying to DOX you. Not much they can do with just an IP. They can get a general area from an IP but unless your home address has registered static IP's (or IP's tied to domains that have your information in them) they can guess at who you are at best.
Hotlinking to images on your own domain (e.g. pembo's pembo210.com) wastes bandwidth. No traffic is being driven to the site itself, and you can see for yourself whether the site has ads.
SRS are on the SoRoS payroll. If you remember, Clinton got access to three-letter agency spying tools given by her friends on the inside. Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc. all work with Clinton Foundation. They always leave backdoors and undisclosed zerodays for the three-letter agencies to exploit. Your computer and/or router running linux isn't going to save you.
I was not implying that you suggest that any verse should have CSS enabled. That was more of a statement to all rather than to you. Sorry that I was not more clear.
Addressing #2. Advertisers are dumb. No, really. They are very, very, dumb. You can sell them "impressions" without specifying what/how/etc.. If your contract is clever you can get them to believe that the 1x1 pixel is only being shown on your website so every time its used it is an impression that they might buy content for (Seriously, most do not check for this, even if they say they do).
Number 3. We can debate that for ages. I was not calling you out, just agreeing that it is possible and with enough resources you could indeed dox someone. It would take connections, cash or both to do so. Nearly no solo operator has enough time/money to dox every single 1x1 image impression. This will bring up the "unique" image impression stuff I know.. buy you understand what I am getting at.
I am more than aware of how the security of the systems I design and build is impacted by outside tampering. You do not need to sell me on the idea, ive been trying to sell it to everyone else for over a decade.
However. With all of that said. You make good points. Thank you for the thought out response.
it gives me hope the government is actually cleaning up their act.
Just don't allow this to interfere with our mindset to ensure that they do. That is what I worry about. Like with Trump talking all this good game, now he gets into office and says maybe we should let all the mexicans in that were brought here "through no fault of their own." I think he could be (((their))) guy, some actor to ruin the reputation of all white males, the final blow delivered in an elaborate ruse. It is totally feasible, whether we realize it or not, he represents us all now.
I like stefan molyneux's analogy for Trump cucking up to DACA. If a child's parents rob a bank, and give that money to the child, "through no fault of their own," are you just going to let them have it after apprehending them? After all, the child is without fault! ...
view the rest of the comments →
level_101 ago
I have always had CSS disabled. Sub-CSS is just like the cancer that was myspace. Why the fuck do you allow it to be enabled.
They are probably paid to do it for ad agencies or are using it to inflate their 'visitor' rate for their own websites to sell ad's on.
Maybe they are trying to DOX you. Not much they can do with just an IP. They can get a general area from an IP but unless your home address has registered static IP's (or IP's tied to domains that have your information in them) they can guess at who you are at best.
SarMegahhikkitha ago
Where did I advise people to enable subverse CSS?
Hotlinking to images on your own domain (e.g. pembo's pembo210.com) wastes bandwidth. No traffic is being driven to the site itself, and you can see for yourself whether the site has ads.
SRS are on the SoRoS payroll. If you remember, Clinton got access to three-letter agency spying tools given by her friends on the inside. Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc. all work with Clinton Foundation. They always leave backdoors and undisclosed zerodays for the three-letter agencies to exploit. Your computer and/or router running linux isn't going to save you.
level_101 ago
Ok, ok. Lets clear it up a little bit ;)
I was not implying that you suggest that any verse should have CSS enabled. That was more of a statement to all rather than to you. Sorry that I was not more clear.
Addressing #2. Advertisers are dumb. No, really. They are very, very, dumb. You can sell them "impressions" without specifying what/how/etc.. If your contract is clever you can get them to believe that the 1x1 pixel is only being shown on your website so every time its used it is an impression that they might buy content for (Seriously, most do not check for this, even if they say they do).
Number 3. We can debate that for ages. I was not calling you out, just agreeing that it is possible and with enough resources you could indeed dox someone. It would take connections, cash or both to do so. Nearly no solo operator has enough time/money to dox every single 1x1 image impression. This will bring up the "unique" image impression stuff I know.. buy you understand what I am getting at.
I am more than aware of how the security of the systems I design and build is impacted by outside tampering. You do not need to sell me on the idea, ive been trying to sell it to everyone else for over a decade.
However. With all of that said. You make good points. Thank you for the thought out response.
1764_sugar_act ago
Some of the doxxing targets could be very valuable. There was that politician who they found on voat thanks to his poor infosec.
Targets such as these could seem worth the resources. Who knows. Most of us are just regular folks but not all.
Womb_Raider ago
Just imagine if Q were a voater and they doxxed him? That would cost a man his life.
1764_sugar_act ago
I imagine Q would use proper security, but idk, then again I don't even believe Q, he could just be some troll. I've seen no proof whatsoever.
Womb_Raider ago
Yeah, I don't think he would make such mistakes.
I'm kind of a skeptic too, but I want to believe. If he's real, it gives me hope the government is actually cleaning up their act.
1764_sugar_act ago
Just don't allow this to interfere with our mindset to ensure that they do. That is what I worry about. Like with Trump talking all this good game, now he gets into office and says maybe we should let all the mexicans in that were brought here "through no fault of their own." I think he could be (((their))) guy, some actor to ruin the reputation of all white males, the final blow delivered in an elaborate ruse. It is totally feasible, whether we realize it or not, he represents us all now.
I like stefan molyneux's analogy for Trump cucking up to DACA. If a child's parents rob a bank, and give that money to the child, "through no fault of their own," are you just going to let them have it after apprehending them? After all, the child is without fault! ...