It's not a whiteshift. It's the deliberate diminishing of white populations. Nothing is shifting to white; white is fading into darkness. Migration is not consensual nor is it natural. It's the plot of many political lobbies.
Nick Griffin said it like it is; first it wasn't happening. Then it was a few tourists. Then illegals. Then war refugees. Then climate refugees. Now, if I may add, they were "always diverse".
Same goes for every white country; for some reason, they have a duty to receive millions of immigrants. America has always been a "nation of immigrants", Germany had the Holocaust, Spain, Britain & France had colonies, Sweden and Canada uh... don't be a bigot, low birthrates, etc. etc. etc.
Meanwhile, muslim countries, Israel, and Asian countries have no pressure to admit them; even when the migrants are muslim. Japan has a low birthrate and still, they don't take in refugees.
These attempts at "diversity" have existed since the 1920's in Germany. Guess who was behind it and who stopped it.
Britain and America started seeking diversity in the sixties, right after WW2. America with the '65 law of migration which made it possible for non-white to emigrate en masse and Britain seeking to become part of a "multi-racial commonwealth". Even nowadays one of the heads of the EU said it should "undermine national homogeneity".
It's all excuses. The causes may vary. I think it's the following: higher population means lower wages, diversity is seen as safety for jews, fulfilling the prophecies of messianic world government, diminishing average IQ, destroying christianity and making it easier to establish trans-national organizations since it erodes national identity.
I'll make a post about Freemasonry admitting this as part of their plan.
This is a more redpilled take than Douglas Murray's book, Strange Death of Europe. But I think his book is important because he goes deep into historical excuses and names all the people behind it who are (((coincidentally))) all jews
view the rest of the comments →
Skeptic5000 ago
It's not a whiteshift. It's the deliberate diminishing of white populations. Nothing is shifting to white; white is fading into darkness. Migration is not consensual nor is it natural. It's the plot of many political lobbies.
Nick Griffin said it like it is; first it wasn't happening. Then it was a few tourists. Then illegals. Then war refugees. Then climate refugees. Now, if I may add, they were "always diverse".
Same goes for every white country; for some reason, they have a duty to receive millions of immigrants. America has always been a "nation of immigrants", Germany had the Holocaust, Spain, Britain & France had colonies, Sweden and Canada uh... don't be a bigot, low birthrates, etc. etc. etc.
Meanwhile, muslim countries, Israel, and Asian countries have no pressure to admit them; even when the migrants are muslim. Japan has a low birthrate and still, they don't take in refugees.
These attempts at "diversity" have existed since the 1920's in Germany. Guess who was behind it and who stopped it.
Britain and America started seeking diversity in the sixties, right after WW2. America with the '65 law of migration which made it possible for non-white to emigrate en masse and Britain seeking to become part of a "multi-racial commonwealth". Even nowadays one of the heads of the EU said it should "undermine national homogeneity".
It's all excuses. The causes may vary. I think it's the following: higher population means lower wages, diversity is seen as safety for jews, fulfilling the prophecies of messianic world government, diminishing average IQ, destroying christianity and making it easier to establish trans-national organizations since it erodes national identity.
I'll make a post about Freemasonry admitting this as part of their plan.
HighEnergyLife ago
This is a more redpilled take than Douglas Murray's book, Strange Death of Europe. But I think his book is important because he goes deep into historical excuses and names all the people behind it who are (((coincidentally))) all jews