Forget the left-right dichotomy, and forget the 4 corners on the political compass. The major ideologies of the modern age, or in other words the enlightenment and post-enlightenment theories of governance are best described by a triangle. One corner is equality taken to the extreme, another corner is order to the extreme, and the last corner is liberty to the extreme.

"Real" communism would best be defined by the purest equality. Fascism in the ultimate form would be the strictest order. Libertarianism is its AnCap form would be the extreme for liberty.

All modern political opinions land somewhere on this triangle. When a policy is changed to favor equality, for example, something is lost in order (and hierarchy) and something is lost in liberty. There can be trade-offs where one corner gains, one corner loses and one corner remains constant. If the geometric form is accepted, then this is fairly easy to prove.

To actually answer your question, when viewed on the left-right scale, fascism is centrism, in the absolute sense, i.e. independent of the overton window, but to an extreme degree. Fascism is culturally traditional. (I avoid the term conservative because ultimately conservative and progressive are terms dependent on the era). Fascism exalts the hierarchies that we recognize at a fundamental level. Hierarchies that need not be spoken to be understood. Fathers as the head of the household, for example, is one of these hierarchies. Valuing the citizens of the state above all other peoples is another example. (As an aside I want to point out that fascism does not require an ethnostate and groups like the Blackshirts of fascist italy and the american Blackshirts party, or the national reform party manage fascism without a racial requirement.)

Fascism is economically left-wing. Fascism protects the working class and is pro-union, but does not shun the sole propreitorship. Fascism invests in maintaining public lands. Fascism uses the power of the central state to organize society via corporations, as opposed to allowing corporations to influence the government. There is so much more and I'm not truly a fascist anymore, so I would encourage you to check out the national reformation party to get some interesting reading on the subject.

“Small government” just means kikes eventually subvert and you allow it because it doesn’t break the NAP. They are allowed to own all mega mass media corps and brainwash your kids into fucking niggers. They are allowed to censor the de facto public square in the form of social media because its private. They are allowed to manipulate search engine results which leads to changing the zeitgeist. They are allowed to lobby the small government to allow mass migration into the nation for profit over the sanctity of the race/culture of the nation. That’s what happens in real life with “real libertarianism.” So yes you are my enemy for allowing a system to continue where kikes have free reign to do anything they want including brainwash people because it doesn’t break the NAP. You need a strong morally righteous state to keep out subversion or it will always worm its way back in because capital will eventually become the de facto morality of the people in a hyper individualist multiculti shithole that will naturally arise. The paradox of small government is that it is easily corrupted and subverted. Libertarianism only works with a white ethnostate with no jews. We don’t live in that reality anymore. The free market is not going to kick out jewish subversives because they run it. They aren’t just going to pack up and leave. Libertarianism makes too many assumptions about human nature just like communism.

Blacks have done more for the nation of america than any immigrant offspring. Most east coast families were boiling pots of onions in Poland and calabria for generations while blacks were building the US economic engine.

He's a jew faggot.

You didn't wanna have sex w women at 13?