I've noticed that the quality of new posts has declined. It is repetitive, represents lower quality evidence, and looks to this observer like something that would confirm some people's biases who think, "This is untrue and just crazy conspiracy theory." Obviously, we want for people to examine the evidence in a calm way and away from their biases, and to have the opportunity to reformulate their views (at which point they may or may not agree with any one of us, but this is at least the process we want to encourage).

There may be more shilling, but I think the primary reason for the lower quality of posting is that many of the larger events have already been documented. In that sense, some repetition is good. Where we do repeat stories, we should make an attempt to incorporate that part of the full summary of pizzagate and add even just one detail or perspective. It's the stories like Australia, Franklin/Boystown, Dutreaux, Jimmy Savile, Sir Edmond (?) Heath, Epstein, etc. that are the most clear-cut and prime minds to understand the gravity of the situation and break down cognitive dissonance that keeps people from pushing for accountability and solutions.

In order to fight the tide of spam, it may be good for a regular to pen a new post that furthers research into one of these core events in the history of the scandal. This should be easy as the amount of information on these cases is large.

Other thoughts?

I may try to do this myself around once a month, though I've had less time recently due to a rollercoaster work schedule. But I'll try...