Nov 2016 - pizzagate investigator accuses pizzagate_private of being "yes-men" - Was BANNED for critical thinking skills and attempting to debunk BAD LEADS (pizzagateshills)

submitted ago by armyseer

I obtained the statement in the post below from:

http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=%22pizzagategear.com%22+pleadingtheyiff&d=4814389378157631&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=uFkENwHK6VONVOcjWtFkJcWxmMFnUqfS

The original link at http://pastebin.com/nv0cmD5W has been deleted.

It is a statement from the matrix chat user ROMDOS who spent many hours contributing to research in the private subreddit pizzagate_private matrix chat room (The user is not myself). The chat room is question is https://matrix.to/#/#pizzagate_private:matrix.org which is listed at http://pizzagate.wiki/Chat_List

It is notable that PleadingTheYiff (Disobedientmedia.com) was indicated as a member of this chat room and appears to have been a leader. Quote from the user who was banned for attempting to use critical thinking skills:

"I have spent close to 20 hours of my time in the last week digging into various leads, trying to debunk bad leads, and presenting new information (ask PleadingTheYiff)"

The statement:

Here's my statement (I'm ROMDOS) in pizzagate_private that got me banned by MadameInternet from both channels:

https://i.sli.mg/9sBtZO.jpgJPG

I thought I was simply stating a pretty common-sense viewpoint: violate reddit's rules == reddit sanctions, and I find it very ironic (at best, hypocritical, at worst) that madame turned right around and censored me for my statement.

Madame then stated:

No he got banned for standing up for our special 3-letter agent, spreading disinfo, and now finally sympathizing with internet censorship.

This is incorrect. There was a user Novak (the supposed 3-letter agent) who got banned by her as well several hours prior, and I had simply asked what the ban was for, and then moved on.

I did not spread any 'disinfo' but sometimes I might come off as cynical because I try to use critical thinking skills, and share what I know or believe to be true, even if it's not a popular opinion.

I don't "sympathize with internet censorship" .. I think a lot of people would agree with me that Spez's edits of posts were totally wrong, and the subreddit ban was probably done in bad-faith, assuming that people were NOT harassing him or posting personally-identifiable information, which is illegal (in the U.S.) afaik.

I have spent close to 20 hours of my time in the last week digging into various leads, trying to debunk bad leads, and presenting new information (ask PleadingTheYiff).

Anyway, I feel like it's dangerous and unhealthy to have a circlejerk of yes-men, and I am not one of them. Please review this info and consider removing my unjustified ban, and please get back to me. Thank you.

-ROMDOS