New Rule Proposal: Ban users that reach a certain negative point value (pizzagatemods)

submitted ago by IShallNotFear

Hi Pizzagate community,

I know most of the members of the pizzagate community are thoughtful and insightful in the comments, however we have several members who just make it their goal to post anti-pizzagate thoughts in the comment sections. The users include "are we sure" (however he/she spells his user name at the time) and "Donkeyhote" and his other alts. I know it can be difficult to ban these types of accounts as there isn't always clear-cut rule violations. However, if we create a rule that bans a user once they reach a certain negative CCP, it will be easier to remove them. It can even be a generous negative CCP number such as -30 or -50. The users who make it their goal to annoy the rest of the community will reach those numbers in no time. Those users will then be banned from posting under any alt account in order to prevent circumventing the rules.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

gamepwn ago

Are We Sure should be banned for sure. Donkeyhole may spout alot of bullshit but sometimes he does hit good information/key notes. I do laugh seeing his alt usernames with 100 variations though. Pizzagate is a connundrum of different elite who abuse children Saying its the Jews fault or the niggers fault or the homosexuals fault is a way to make new users turned off and think we are an entremist site. The monsters who do this shit have many nationalities, skin colors, and religions. We find these demons in all walks of life. I dont even consider these people Human...demons. Im torn on the banning issue because it can very easily be misused.

think- ago

I don't think he is funny, although he sometimes amuses me.

He wrote that sexual abuse is less harmful for a child than growing up without a father (will try to find this comment and add later).

Sorry, but a board which is designated to fight pedophilia cannot accept someone who promotes pedophilia.

Factfinder2 ago

I didn't read the statement you attribute to DonkeyHole--usually just skip or skim his/her stuff. If I find that s/he did say that, then I'll block the account.

Since there's apparently no way to ban an IP address, banning is pointless and has the potential to do more harm than good because of vengeful downvoating alts.

think- ago

1) [–] DanteKeyhoe -1 points (+1|-2) 2 months ago

'Actually there's a vast amount of evidence to prove that being molested is FAR LESS HARMFUL than being raised with no father.'

Comment was made on this thread: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2166431

Factfinder2 ago

That was a quote by syrazie, who didn't indicate which Voat thread she got it from. Since Donkey didn't accuse her of misquoting, it's no doubt accurate.

I've blocked DanteKeyhoe and will block any alt or other user who advocates for or downplays/denies the harm caused by pedophilia.

think- ago

That was a quote by syrazie

I beg to differ... ;-)

It's the first line of an original comment by him, you'll find it about half way down this thread I linked above:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2166431

[–] DanteKeyhoe -1 points (+1|-2) 3 months ago

Actually there's a vast amount of evidence to prove that being molested is FAR LESS HARMFUL than being raised with no father. I bet you know people personally that demonstate this. Ever hear of CRIMINALITY, ADDICTION? Thanks for proving my point further: you literally couldn't hurt a fly. That's female leadership, Merkel would be proud.

You don't know a FUCKING THING ABOUT HUMAN BEINGS. I would bet money you haven't read a book cover to cover without using FUCKING CRAYONS

Anyway, thanks for blocking him, I've done the same.

Factfinder2 ago

Okay, there it is. Thanks.

think- ago

Welcome.