You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

thebearfromstartrack ago

What if we just ate the animals that died of old age (or accident)? Would that be a reduction of product?

MisterGrieves ago

Peta kills more animals than they save.

thebearfromstartrack ago

But they aren't trying to. It's a shame, what if PETA were IN CHARGE. Dark days.

MisterGrieves ago

You mean they aren't trying to save animals right?

thebearfromstartrack ago

I was thinking they start killing people to save animals sort of "Thing". You know the "liberal" WAY of logic and "correctness".

MisterGrieves ago

Oh they are way WAY pay that liberal logic in thinking that animals are better off dead than pets. Fucking insane.

thebearfromstartrack ago

They "decide" then WE MUST conform or ELSE. Liberalism has, through it's own stupidity, given itself a contradictory meaning. INSANITY is not synonymous with LIBERAL last time I checked the BOOK (Thesaurus). It's ALWAYS been nearby though. I think liberals CONSISTANTLY opt for insanity over prudence though when asked a question with NO hard pat FACTUAL answer. "Don't jump off that cliff!"...."Why, I only MIGHT die". Then hand YOU the hospital bill as a matter of SOCIAL JUSTICE. Claiming we are ALL equal, which is an OBVIOUS lie. Like saying a thrown rod in your engine is just as good as the rods that didn't punch through.