Every once in a while I look up Sarah Ruth Ashcraft to see if there are any updates with her.
As a reminder, she is Tom Hanks' main accuser, saying he assaulted her when she was 13. She says her father, who had a position in the Michigan Democratic Party at the time, actually sold her to Hanks.
Well, the first thing I found was a woman named Danielle who has been posting about Sarah extensively just recently. She expresses concerns regarding Sarah's well-being due to recent Twitter posts.
https://drdannielleblumenthal.wordpress.com/2020/10/13/wellness-check-sarah-ruth-ashcraft-10-12-2020/
https://drdannielleblumenthal.wordpress.com/2020/10/11/concern-for-sarah-ruth-ashcraft-10-11-2020/
Next, I checked Sarah's Twitter, and there is in-fact a lot going on there.
https://mobile.twitter.com/SaRaAshcraft
She expresses disapproval of this Danielle woman and expresses that her life has been in danger and that the authorities are working against her. She also states that Chris, who this whole time has been her supportive partner, was actually in on the lies and even trafficking her.
I don't know what to make of all this, but it is certainly a big development in this case related to Tom Hanks' most or only public accuser. Importantly, Sarah Ruth Ashcraft also accused Hillary Clinton of abusing her as a child.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
I read some of this on Twitter. I'm not sure what to make of "Sarah". On the one hand, she has outted her father, posting pics and I assume fully doxing herself. She has been kind to everyone outside of her family, Hanks and Hillary. On the other, she has said a lot of super weird crap. The kind of crap that feeds right into the "crazy conspiritard cult" narrative that shills from Shareblue have been advancing ever since 2016.
For example: she posts Q stuff and claims it's about her like this Rachel Chandler Insta photo that Q posted: https://mobile.twitter.com/SaRaAshcraft/status/1108778071891591168. That thread -- to me -- reads very similarly to some of the stuff posted by the bot fixated on Racine. Same co-opting of other people's work to support their own narrative. Same lack of verifiability. Same effect on reader of jacking up emotions.
She, on the other hand, has always respected the submission rules here and shared our work, which is very un-shillish.
I honestly don't know what to think of her.
Truthseeker3000 ago
Her story never added up with all her claims. There are people out there with serious psychological/psychiatric issues who claim things they read and hear that never actually happened to them. She is the second I’ve read. There was another on here before a couple years ago.
3141592653 ago
who was the other?
Truthseeker3000 ago
Please click my screen name and read my 3 lowest rated comments on the page from a while back. No one believed me.
3141592653 ago
ok i just read them again. im not sure. why are you so certain ashcraft is lying? i tend to believe her and almost all survivors.