I was going through my John Lennon "Imagine" box set book and came across this postcard which he sent to his PR guy Elliot Mintz in 1978.
https://imgur.com/a/UszH3Sr
The postcard, depicting the young actress from "Lolita" and another image of a young girl, immediately struck me as odd. Then the caption, cryptically reading "just a thought" immediately got my pizzagate-senses tingling.
Is John Lennon or are any of the other Beatles known to be "baddies"? I read an unsourced story of The Beatles going to an underage sex party with Jimmy Saville, but it just seems so far fetched I don't know what to believe!
view the rest of the comments →
zx9000 ago
Nah, not the Beatles!!!
illuminalto2 ago
Yeah this times 1,000.
The fuck man.
It's fucked when you know.
cueanon2 ago
"Yeah this times 1,000. It's fucked when you know." Um, care to back that up with evidence or u just pissing into the wind?
illuminalto2 ago
Let's see, cover art depicting dismemberd baby dolls and pizza?
Kind of hard to miss the symbology after PizzaGate revelation.
cueanon2 ago
You're ignoring the context in which the cover was shot. "Although the photo was intended to be part of a larger work critiquing the adulation afforded the Beatles, the band members insisted it was a statement against the Vietnam War. Others interpreted it as the Beatles protesting the record company's policy of "butchering" their albums for the North American market. In response to outrage from record retailers, the LP was withdrawn and the cover replaced with a shot of the band posed around a steam trunk."
illuminalto2 ago
Right, but in looking up the purpose for the cover's creating, you can find numerous stories and "interpretations".
What is the interpretation of putting more than one pedophile on the cover of your band's album art?
That they were just lonely hearts?
Give me a break.
cueanon2 ago
You're stretching so far you're in danger of snapping like a rubber band.
illuminalto2 ago
I haven't stretched anything.
I'm still standing on my original point that I made at the top.
There are satanists and pedophiles on the cover of Sgt. Pepper album.
You know they are there, think it's cool, and are willing to defend it.
cueanon2 ago
You're either a moron or a shill, likely both, as the significance of the cover is not in any way connected with endorsing pedophilia.
illuminalto2 ago
"Just because I keep the company of pedophiles, doesn't mean I'm a pedophile"
Saville toured with the beatles, he booked them when they were nobody, he helped them break into the music business. He remained friends with them for a long, long time.
Saville was a prolific pedophile and child trafficker.
If you can ignore this fact, then I guess the pedophiles on the cover of the album were just coincidentally placed there because people like Aleistar Crowley were actually famous celebrities who had unfortunate accidents in their lives.
People like Karl Marx, whose communist musings led to the death of 25 million or more in Communist Russia during WW1 are actually just famous celebrities.
Jesus man.
cueanon2 ago
Dude, you're going to have to back up your rant with some evidence. "Saville toured with the beatles, he booked them when they were nobody, he helped them break into the music business. He remained friends with them for a long, long time." Show me the evidence. I'm calling your bluff.
And even if you could do that, which you can't, you'd have to show evidence that John, Paul, George or Ringo advocated for pedophilia at any time in their lives.