You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

illuminalto2 ago

The Beatles featured satanist Aliestar Crowley as one of their "admired persons" in the background of the cover of Sgt. Peppers Lonely hearts club band album.

What does this tell us?

Lennon and McCartney also got groovy with reknown satanist pedophile and self proclaimed "fixer" Jimmy Saville (another Epstein level character, trafficking and all).

So yeah.

Lennon was also a raging heroin addict who beat his women as per different biographies about him.

Like so many, I love their music, but it hurts to know the truth.

And now a random opinion with no fact behind it, maybe the Beatles were themselves groomed? Maybe they themselves were abused and then given all the fame and fortune to reinforce the quid pro quo attitude of the twisted music industry?

Just spit balling.

cueanon2 ago

Crowley wasn't "admired." He was depicted as another lonely heart, as in "all the lonely people, where do they all belong?"

The Beatles "got groovy" with Saville? Evidence? What does "groovy" imply or is that simply baseless innuendo?

illuminalto2 ago

Crowley wasn't "admired." He was depicted as another lonely heart, as in "all the lonely people, where do they all belong?"

Sure. The cover also features Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, and ravenous pedophile Oscar Wilde.

Just a bunch of lonely hearts!

The Beatles "got groovy" with Saville? Evidence? What does "groovy" imply or is that simply baseless innuendo?

It was definitely innuendo.

cueanon2 ago

The cover has over 30 people on it including Mae West, Marilyn Monroe, Laurel and Hardy, Carl Jung and Bob Dylan. You're selectively editing for purposes of innuendo.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_images_on_the_cover_of_Sgt._Pepper%27s_Lonely_Hearts_Club_Band

illuminalto2 ago

I'm not selectively editing shit.

I'm factually listing people who were on the cover of Sgt. Pepper's album.

You refuse to weed out the turds in your garden salad and insist that it still tastes good to you.

That's fine. Eat up.

cueanon2 ago

You were trying to imply that everyone on the cover had some kind of connection to pedophilia, which is false. In fact very few of them do.

binrobinro ago

I didn't see that implied anywhere.

illuminalto2 ago

imply that everyone on the cover had some kind of connection to pedophilia

I never said that EVERYONE on the cover has some kind of connection to pedophilia. Nor did I ever imply it.

I simply pointed out the low hanging fruit.

which is false. In fact very few of them do.

VERY INTERESTING that you persist to defend the beatles, when you openly admit that you KNOW that some of the people on the cover of that album ARE connected to pedophilia.

Very. Interesting.

cueanon2 ago

That's interesting? In what way?

illuminalto2 ago

Interesting to hear you spin your point.

You just admitted that the album cover has more than one pedophile featured on the front.

After twisting my words to try and make me incorrect.

And even though you admit there are pedophiles (and satanists) on the cover of the album, you still persist that it's not a big deal and there could have possibly been no ill intentions behind it.

cueanon2 ago

You mistakenly persist in thinking the cover's purpose is for admiration of the people on it, when it's a depiction of the "lonely hearts club band", a bunch of lonely celebrities with issues who happened to be famous.