You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Blacksmith21 ago

Need more than circuitous references. Anything documenting Dhalvad's pedo acivities would be a good start.

MercurysBall2 ago

Okay, here's an article saying that the whole BiChip thing is a hoax, just like Pizzagate. I'm wondering if they are trying to discredit the whole Bill Gates and his nanotechnology vaccines just like the 'Pizzagate and Comet Ping Pong was a hoax' schtick.. https://www.patheos.com/blogs/infernal/2019/11/the-most-elaborate-display-of-ineptitude-i-have-ever-witnessed-the-bichip-hoax/

Vindicator ago

Wow. That was a hell of a confusing article. Almost impossible to follow, and loaded with "evidence". It's a pattern I've seen repeatedly used here, which I'd say is probably from some alphabet agency training manual. Note the very last line:

Please subscribe to my Patreon page: https://www.patreon.com/LucienGreaves

The dude seems to be some sort of Satanist, as far as I could follow his posts. He is a contributor on Patheos to the "For Infernal Use Only" blog. Here's another of his recent submissions there, "debunking" SRA:

The False “Survivor Advocates” Whose Incompetence Helped Weinstein’s Defense

Vindicator ago

@Blacksmith21 see parent. This looks like information warfare all right.

Blacksmith21 ago

As I just said to @think-, this tale has all the telltale signs of circular reporting a la FBI tactics. Something quoted and requoted with a slight paraphrase of the original source.

I called it out on v/GA OP. Amazing that it received that many upcoats = lack of critical thinking skills.

Vindicator ago

I wish there were more critical thinkers among the rank and file. Sadly, most just want to be told things.

argosciv ago

Sadly, most just want to be told things.

Which is precisely why disinformation spreads so easily, especially when the target audience won't even take a moment to listen to a source close to the matter, eg: Lucien.

Now I'm far from a fan of Lucien and his TST (as expressed in the GA submission), but even I can put that aside for the purpose of reading his article on the BiChip situation. Reading through that recount shows just how ridiculous and subversive the BiChip/Biohackinfo hoax is.

To quote an excerpt from the end of Lucien's post (formatting added for emphasis) in relation to what I quoted from you:

This Biohackinfo episode is easily the most elaborate and complicated display of absolute ineptitude that I have ever witnessed. I can only assume that they actually think their ploy is clever and that it will somehow prove convincing to a wider audience. They just may even be delusional enough to truly believe that their manufactured revelations will cause — as they put it — a “geopolitical shitstorm,” though to what end I can only still just speculate. One would pity them for their troubled idiocy if it were not so visibly stained with antagonistic malice. They created marketing materials for a fictitious product. They created a company and a villainous CEO. They managed to get media to pick up a press release. They manufactured a hoax conference. They put a massive amount of work into a complicated plot that was simultaneously so absurdly poorly-thought.

Indeed, judging by the unfathomably high amount of upvotes, it seems that both yourself and Lucien were right, Vin. This did prove convincing to a target audience because a lot of people just want to be told things and as I said they won't listen to sources they've been taught to reject.

Now we can all go back to hating Lucien/TST for whatever reason suits us, but I'm glad he took the time to lay out this BiChip bullshit. Most importantly, I remind you all to reconcile the attempted smear of Wikileaks by association with BiChip's alleged (and likely real) donation to them, with the fact that Biohackinfo, "USA Hackers" (the two who originally began the smear over the donation) and BiChip are quite plainly working together and tried to create a situation which they could spin as "Wikileaks is connected to 'Satanists'!".

If we're to believe for argument's sake, that the donation is real, that's 12,000 in bitcoin (which potentially equates to far more in monetary value, depending on the currency) which was pumped into this smear/hoax at a minimum. Who the hell has that kind of money to spend on a smear? Who is really behind BiChip et al? What is their motive against Wikileaks? How does the Microsoft -> BEHZ -> BiChip relationship fit in to the picture?

What, if any, motive does Bill Gates have to smear Wikileaks?

 

Yes, I think it looks like the whole entire point of this is a smear against Wikileaks and an attempt to sully communities like pizzagate with yet another steaming pile of disinfo. It is possible that this is damage control related to Microsoft (2 birds one stone: smear Wikileaks and discredit criticism/suspicion of Gates – considering that Gates is known to have used Epstein's jet and to my knowledge has refused to explain, and that the article in circulation centers on claiming that an enigmatic figure is a bigger/worse pedophile than Epstein), though I cannot be sure at this time.

@darkknight111 @EricKaliberhall @Blacksmith21 @MolochHunter @kestrel9

Vindicator ago

Good analysis.

argosciv ago

Oh look, a < 7 hour old account is trying to validate the divide over Wikileaks and convince everyone that there's not enough evidence to say Assange is alive or dead despite the many journalists who have seen him alive in the court room (we even had a photo leak which nearly got the person who took it in a lot of trouble), despite his lawyers and current Wikileaks Editor in Chief confirming he's alive and facing trial, despite the ongoing attempt to extradite him by the U.S...

What a fucking joke.

https://voat.co/v/4chan/3836370/

@Blacksmith21 @kestrel9 @darkknight111 @MolochHunter @EricKaliberhall